My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-05-09 Interview, Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-05-09 Interview, Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2016 10:55:58 AM
Creation date
5/5/2016 6:00:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/9/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
478
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9.B - Page 11 <br /> Table 2, provided in Attachment 2 of this staff report, summarizes the site proposed site <br /> development regulations for commercial floor area and residential density. A complete <br /> site development regulation table, including height, setbacks, and other standards is <br /> provided in Attachment 3. <br /> Table 2 also includes a comparison of the IHSP regulations in the IH-1 and IH-2 land <br /> use areas, which would allow the highest development intensities, with similar existing <br /> zone districts located throughout the City. The table illustrates that the proposed IHSP <br /> floor areas and densities are generally in-line with similar existing districts. For example, <br /> the IH-2 floor area standard, a maximum FAR of 1.0 with bonus, is consistent with the <br /> Commercial Park (CP) zone district. CP zoned areas include the Pacific Shores Center <br /> at the end of Seaport Road and Seaport Center at Chesapeake Drive and Seaport <br /> Road. <br /> Traffic Impacts <br /> As described above, the Draft EIR identifies potential significant impacts. All can be <br /> mitigated to Less Than Significant levels in conformance with applicable standard <br /> measures and project-level mitigation measures except for the significant unavoidable <br /> Transportation and Traffic impacts. The same is true for impacts related to the Harbor <br /> View Place Project. However, a greater number intersections would be considered have <br /> significant and unavoidable impacts. <br /> Council should be aware that even the No Project alternative, which allows growth <br /> through the existing General Plan, would still generate significant and avoidable impacts <br /> at studied intersections. <br /> The charts in Attachment 4 illustrate the intersection impacts surrounding the Inner <br /> Harbor area: <br /> • Figure 1: Existing Conditions <br /> • Figure 2: Conditions in 2040, without the IHSP <br /> • Figure 3: Conditions in 2040, with the IHSP <br /> • Figure 4: Conditions in 2040, with the IHSP and with mitigations including the <br /> construction of the 101/84 interchange project <br /> Figure 4 illustrates intersection improvements with the construction of the 101/84 <br /> interchange improvement project. In 2040 some intersections would operate an <br /> acceptable levels, while others would operate at unacceptable levels. This is generally <br /> consistent with the findings from the recently released US Highway 101/SR 84 <br /> Interchange Improvement Project Initial Study with Proposed Negative <br /> Declaration/Environmental Assessment document. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.