Laserfiche WebLink
9.0 - Page 34 <br /> Table 13-Incentives to Use Commute Alternatives <br /> Number Percent <br /> Incentive Financial incentives 90 58% <br /> Work schedule flexibility 80 52% <br /> Guaranteed ride home in an emergency 41 26% <br /> Help finding carpool/vanpool partners 32 21% <br /> Shuttle between transit station and work place 27 17% <br /> Transit passes sold at work 16 10% <br /> On-site services(banking,convenience store,dry cleaning) 11 7% <br /> Bike lockers/showers at work 11 7% <br /> Awards/prizes 11 7% <br /> Better bike/walk access 9 6% <br /> Help with transit information 6 4% <br /> Special parking for carpools/vanpools 3 2% <br /> Total Respondents(N)* 155 NA <br /> *Note: Because respondents were invited to select more than one answer, the <br /> percentages for each factor add up to more than 100%. <br /> Section 5: Employee Home Locations <br /> Home location obviously has a strong influence on employee commute mode. Table 14 shows the top <br /> five home locations for your employees, and Table 15 shows employee home zip codes for all survey <br /> respondents. This information is useful for identifying clusters of employees who could form carpools <br /> and vanpools. You can also identify appropriate transit information based on where clusters of <br /> employees live (e.g., bus routes) and make that information available. You might want to plot the data <br /> on a zip code map (available from the 511 Regional Rideshare & Bicycling Program). <br /> Table 14-Top Five Home Locations <br /> Number Percent <br /> Home Cities of the Redwood City 45 22% <br /> Respondents San Francisco 20 10% <br /> San Mateo 16 8% <br /> Fremont 12 6% <br /> San Jose 11 5% <br /> Total 104 51% <br /> *Top 5 locations only <br />