My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-05-23 Closed, Joint SA and PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-05-23 Closed, Joint SA and PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 11:36:55 AM
Creation date
5/19/2016 4:03:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/23/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.C. - Page 4 <br /> Recent City Council Discussion on Affordable Housing: On April 11, 2016, the City <br /> Council held a study session to discuss funding options for affordable housing. <br /> Challenges for affordable housing construction often include lack of adequate sites and <br /> longer time frames with grant funding and tax credit requirements. It can be difficult for <br /> nonprofits to compete successfully against market-rate developments for land <br /> acquisition. <br /> Staff has concerns with requiring that 20% of all housing units downtown be affordable. <br /> This approach would not allow the City to consider the 801 Brewster project, which <br /> would provide and 50 affordable units without a City contribution. This would likely <br /> increase the time frame for bringing needed affordable housing to market. It would also <br /> require that any remaining residential projects downtown be 100 percent affordable, <br /> with the associated challenges of funding land acquisition and construction, and a <br /> longer time-to-market. <br /> Affordability Levels: At the initiation hearing, City Council discussed the possibility of <br /> specifying affordability levels for the 375 units. There are four levels of affordability <br /> possible: extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income units. Staff recommends <br /> that all 375 units be affordable to low, very low, and extremely low income households <br /> (households with 80 percent of median income or below). Though this precludes <br /> moderate-income units (up to 120 percent of median income), it is a more common level <br /> of affordability that qualifies for tax credits and is compatible with rental projects. The <br /> qualifying units would be required to meet the requirements described in the newly- <br /> adopted Affordable Housing Impact Fee Ordinance Section 18.272 (Standards for <br /> Development of Affordable Housing). These requirements include deed-restricting the <br /> projects for an affordability term of up to 55 years, similar size and finishes to market- <br /> rate units, and concurrent availability of the units with market-rate units. The proposed <br /> resolution references these sections and their requirements. This affordability level <br /> policy would go further than what was required under Redevelopment. Redevelopment <br /> allowed a significant percentage of affordable housing to be developed at the <br /> "moderate" income level. <br /> GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING COMPLIANCE <br /> This reservation would also be consistent with numerous policies in the City Housing <br /> Element, as well as recent policy direction given by Council. <br /> • Urban Form and Land Use Policy BE-18.7: Pursue mixed-use housing and <br /> commercial development in Downtown that includes a range of housing options <br /> and affordability levels. <br /> • Housing Element Policy H-2.5: Consider various avenues to ensure the provision <br /> or construction of affordable housing and other community benefits. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.