Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.B. - Page 7 —3— AB 2502 <br /> 1 (c) While many of these local programs have been in place for <br /> 2 decades,the recent decision in Palmer/Sixth Street Properties,L.P. <br /> 3 v. City of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1396, has created <br /> 4 uncertainty and confusion for local governments regarding the <br /> 5 future viability of this important local land use tool. <br /> 6 (d) It is the intent of the Legislature to reaffirm the authority of <br /> 7 local jurisdictions to enact and enforce these ordinances. <br /> 8 (e) The Legislature declares its intent in adding subdivision(g) <br /> 9 to Section 65850 of the Government Code, pursuant to Section 1 <br /> 10 of this act,to supersede any holding or dicta in Palmer/Sixth Street <br /> 11 Properties, L.P. v. City of Los Angeles (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th <br /> 12 1396,to the extent that the opinion in that case conflicts with that <br /> 13 subdivision. This act shall not otherwise be construed to enlarge <br /> 14 or diminish the authority of a jurisdiction beyond those powers <br /> 15 that existed as of July 21, 2009. <br /> 16 (f) It is the intent of the Legislature to reaffirm that existing law <br /> 17 requires that the action of any legislative body of any city, county, <br /> 18 or city and county to adopt a new inclusionary housing ordinance <br /> 19 be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly <br /> 20 consistent with the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act <br /> 21 (Chapter 9(commencing with Section 54950)of Part 1 of Division <br /> 22 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code). <br /> 0 <br /> 97 <br />