My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-06-27 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-06-27 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2016 10:47:54 AM
Creation date
6/23/2016 4:49:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/27/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
689
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FISCAL IMPACT <br />The ENA describes the City’s commitment of $5,000,000 towards the Project with <br />$4,000,000 coming from the Parks Impact Fees (development fees) and $1,000,000 <br />from the commitment from Stanford University’s development agreement. This funding <br />has been designated in the recommended FY 2016-17 Capital Improvement Program, <br />which is anticipated to be approved by the City Council on June 27, 2016. Future <br />financial commitments include the following: <br />· The City and the YMCA-SV will share equally in the design costs associated with <br />the master planning process and Phase I improvements. <br />· The City will assume all fees and expenses associated with future zoning, <br />entitlements and permitting for the Project <br />· The City will pay the costs incurred in connection with the environmental review <br />requirements associated with the development of the Project pursuant to CEQA, <br />and the YMCA-SV will reimburse the City for fifty percent of all CEQA costs once <br />there is a determination for a Project. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />This action is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality <br />Act because the activity involves entering into exclusive negotiations on a prospective <br />project, but does not create a commitment to a specific project. (Public Resource Code <br />§ 21065; Guidelines § 15378) During the term of the ENA as the Project develops, the <br />City will conduct CEQA review. <br /> <br />CHRIS BETH <br />DIRECTOR PARKS AND RECREATION <br /> <br />MELISSA STEVENSON DIAZ <br />CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />RELATED DOCUMENTS IN CITY CLERK’S OFFICE <br />1. Letter of Intent <br />6.1.B. - Page 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.