Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> December 14, 1992 - economic impact report from the Mobile Home Park owners, <br /> community input regarding the economic consultant's report, and Council <br /> decision whether or not to pursue the matter. <br /> REPORTS: Western Mobilehome Association, 12/8/92 <br /> Williams, Kuebelbeck & Associates, Inc., undated <br /> Letter from Terry R. Dowdall, Swanson and Dowdall, 12/8/92 <br /> Assistant Finance Director Ponty presented a summary of the current <br /> discussions of mobile home rent stabilization in Redwood City. <br /> Paul Deffebach, Western Mobilehome Association Representative, introduced <br /> Mr. Todd Clayter, Economist of Williams, Kuebelbeck & Associates, Inc. who <br /> assisted in the analysis of return on investment under rent control <br /> described in their report with the following conclusions: 1) the implied <br /> interest rate is lower than financing currently available; 2) cash on cash <br /> return is 5.43%, and typical return is 15% to 20%; 3) alternative investment <br /> analysis shows average annual rate of return based on NOI yields 3.2%, and <br /> relatively risk-free T-Bill investment yields 7.5%; 4) based on Goldberg <br /> study, proposed ordinance will render Mobile Home Parks in Redwood City an <br /> uncompetitive investment; and 5) vacancy control provides a windfall to <br /> mobile home sellers. <br /> Mr. Kuebelbeck, of Williams, Kuebelbeck & Associates Inc., answered Council <br /> questions regarding available loans, financial data of mobile home park <br /> owners, investment analyses used, and a fair and reasonable return on <br /> investment is typically 15 - 18%. <br /> Paul Deffebach, Western Mobilehome Association Representative, referred to <br /> the report he had submitted and advised that of the 491 spaces in all the <br /> parks in Redwood City, 409 were under long term leases for three more years <br /> and would be excluded from any rent control ordinance, and approximately <br /> sixty-one were trailers which would be excluded as well. Therefore, there <br /> were only 20 or 21 spaces that would be affected by any rent control <br /> ordinance. Mr. Deffebach advised that the current long term leases were a <br /> form of rent control negotiated between the owner and resident, and <br /> increases were tied to the CPl. Also, currently, 40% of spaces in Redwood <br /> City were being rented well below market levels. <br /> Councilwoman Steinfeld cited costs in the thousands borne by Hayward, <br /> Rohnert Park, and San Jose in administering rent control ordinances, and <br /> asked why so much staff work and time was being spent for 20 spaces. <br /> Councilwoman Steinfeld suggested a study session to determine why a rent <br /> control ordinance is needed at this time. <br /> Terry R. Dowdall, Santa Ana, California, representing Harbor Village <br /> Mobilehome Park, advised the Council he was the primary author of the leases <br /> that were negotiated in 1985 and described them as a voluntary system of <br /> rent regulation. Mr. Dowdall cited Birkenfeld v. City of Berkeley (1976) as <br /> the seminal rent control case in California which "established factual <br /> requirements which must exist to establish a legitimate rational connection <br /> for rent control under the police power clause of the California <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 51 Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> Page No. 266 December 14, 1992 <br /> Page 6 <br />