My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2016 5:31:02 PM
Creation date
7/21/2016 5:14:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
7/25/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2015-2016 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 12 <br />Hillsborough 27 <br />• Officer activated whenever unit emergency lights are activated <br />• Officer may review video while writing his/her report subject to approval of Watch <br />Commander <br />• Data retention is minimum of one year <br /> <br />Menlo Park <br />• Officer activated prior to arrival to any in-progress or serious or high-priority <br />call for service <br />• Officer may review video while writing his/her report <br />• Data retention is 2.5 years for all citizen contacts. Recordings classified as evidence will <br />be retained for a period of time determined by applicable laws and the City of Menlo <br />Park's retention guidelines. <br />The command staff interviewed by the Grand Jury acknowledged that some policies may require <br />modification as more experience with body-worn cameras is obtained, as case law on body-worn <br />cameras develops, and as applicable state or federal law evolves. <br />Privacy and Civil Rights Issues <br />Not surprisingly, civil rights issues are of concern to local law enforcement agencies when <br />generating policies regarding use of body-worn cameras. Protection of the privacy and civil <br />rights of all individuals encountered by law enforcement is a topic of discussion throughout the <br />country. In the case of body-worn cameras, privacy concerns apply to the public's right to <br />privacy and the police officer's rights as well. According to several police chiefs interviewed by <br />the Grand Jury, there are occasions when it is inadvisable or prohibited by written policy to turn <br />on a body-worn camera. For example: <br />• Discussions among police officers not related to encounters with the public <br />(i.e., administrative, procedural, tactical, and training) <br />• Officer personal time such as break time, private conversations with colleagues, or non- <br />police-call related conversations among others <br />• During certain extremely sensitive investigations such as interviews with sexual assault <br />victims and some family disputes especially when minors may be involved <br />• Officer interactions with confidential informants, undercover agents, federal agents, <br />issuing K-9 commands to police dogs, or when discussing confidential tactical <br />information such as SWAT team deployments <br />• When there are no encounters with the public or when writing shift reports <br /> <br />27 Until the Hillsborough Police Department completes its Body-Worn Camera Policy, it is using the policy written <br />for Mobile Audio Video (i.e., dash cams) as modified by Chief's Departmental Directive 14-01, September 2, 2014. <br />6.1.J. - Page 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.