My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2016 5:31:02 PM
Creation date
7/21/2016 5:14:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
7/25/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> <br />plan. Whether a supplemental EIR or other environmental document must be prepared <br />depends upon the analysis of the subsequent activity in light of the existing EIR. The <br />City performed this analysis, which ultimately shows that further environmental review is <br />not required. Three sets of interrelated provisions of the CEQA Guidelines demonstrate <br />why the Project does not require further environmental review. <br /> <br />First, CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c) provides that if the City has already prepared <br />an EIR for a comprehensive land use plan such as the DTPP, unless the subsequent <br />activities would create new significant impacts or require new mitigation measures, as <br />analyzed under CEQA Guidelines section 15162, the City may find that the Project is <br />within the scope of the EIR. <br /> <br />Second, CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 provide that the City shall not <br />prepare another EIR unless the City determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, <br />that certain conditions exist that will lead to a new significant impact or substantial <br />increase in the severity of a previously identified impact, or that a new or previously <br />rejected mitigation measure or alternative would substantially reduce significant effects. <br /> <br />Third, CEQA Guidelines section 15183 provides that if the City has prepared an EIR for <br />a zoning plan (like the DTPP), the City shall not prepare another EIR “except as may be <br />necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant impacts which are <br />peculiar to the project or its siteS.” <br /> <br />The City followed these three sets of provisions. The City prepared a written checklist <br />(i.e., the Initial Study) to evaluate the site-specific Project in light of the DTPP EIR. The <br />City analyzed whether the Project would create new significant impacts or substantial <br />increases in the severity of previously identified significant impacts, or whether a new <br />mitigation measure or alternative would substantially reduce significant effects. No such <br />impacts were identified. Nor is any new mitigation measure or alternative required to <br />substantially reduce any significant impact. Thus, an additional EIR is not required. <br />Further, because the Project is consistent with the DTPP for which an EIR was <br />prepared, and there are no significant impacts peculiar to this Project or the subject site, <br />or any other circumstances which require an EIR, no further environmental review <br />is/was required. Accordingly, the City’s environmental review process complies with <br />CEQA, pursuant to sections 15168, 15162, 15163 and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. <br /> <br />ii. CEQA Analysis for New or Expanded Police and/or Fire Facilities Is <br />Not Required. <br /> <br />8.C. - Page 18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.