My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2016 5:31:02 PM
Creation date
7/21/2016 5:14:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
7/25/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> <br />General Plan Traffic Projections <br />The Redwood City General Plan was adopted on October 11, 2010. An Environmental <br />Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the General Plan that, among other things, <br />considered existing traffic and circulation and modeled potential future traffic generation <br />based on full build-out of the various land use designations throughout the City. For this <br />analysis the City developed a citywide travel demand model based on the C/CAG <br />regional model, which includes land use and transportation network information for the <br />region. The model forecasted morning and evening peak period traffic for all major <br />roadways with the City. <br /> <br />Recent economic growth in the Bay Area has contributed to a rise in traffic volumes on <br />streets throughout the region and in Redwood City. Comparing traffic counts from the <br />last three years with traffic volumes from the General Plan EIR shows that some <br />segments have higher volumes than were projected in the EIR. In each instance where <br />this occurred, the recently collected traffic volumes do not represent a new or more <br />significant impact than was identified in the EIR. Table 5 below illustrates this using <br />Hopkins Avenue as an example since recent counts on Hopkins were quite different <br />from the volumes estimated in the General Plan EIR. <br /> <br />Table 5: Comparison of General Plan and Recent Traffic Volumes on <br />Hopkins Avenue (Hudson to Broadway) <br /> “Existing” <br />Volume <br />(2008) <br />“Project” <br />Volumes <br />(2030)2 <br />Recent <br />Traffic <br />Count3 <br />Volume <br />Threshold <br />for LOS E4 <br />Additional Volume <br />Required to Trigger <br />Impact (LOS E) <br />Average Daily <br />Traffic (ADT) <br />7,1001 --- 7,600 --- __ <br />AM Peak <br />Hour Volume <br />358 440 830 1,610 780 <br />PM Peak <br />Hour Volume <br />595 260 737 1,610 873 <br />1 Redwood City New General Plan Technical Report (September 2008). Figure 7: Roadway Segment Average Daily <br />Traffic Volume <br />2 Redwood City New General Plan Draft EIR (May 2010). Table 4.14-2 Existing (2008) Roadway Segment Levels of <br />Service Summary <br />3 Traffic counts collected March 2015. <br />4 Redwood City New General Plan Draft EIR (May 2010). Table 4.14-1 Roadway Segment LOS Thresholds <br />5 This hourly volume is unusually low for a roadway with an ADT of 7,100 vehicles. As a general rule of thumb peak <br />hour volumes are 10% of the daily traffic volume. <br /> <br />The last two columns on Table 5 above illustrate the volume threshold for level of <br />service (LOS) E as well as the number of additional trips required to trigger LOS E <br />along this segment of roadway, which would be considered a new significant impact. <br />LOS A – D are considered acceptable levels of service, whereas LOS E and F are <br />considered unacceptable. If traffic goes from LOS A to LOS D, no new impacts are <br />8.C. - Page 20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.