My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-07-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2016 5:31:02 PM
Creation date
7/21/2016 5:14:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
7/25/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
26 <br /> <br />properties compatible with adjacent historic resources and/or districts. The Project is in <br />conformance with all of these related DTPP regulations, and the required architectural <br />historian’s review found that the Project would not have an impact on the significance of <br />the historic resource at 620 Jefferson Avenue, nor would the Project create a <br />“substantial adverse change” that would affect the eligibility of the resource to be listed <br />on the California Register of Historic Resources. This analysis complies with EIR <br />Mitigation Measure 7-4 and the DTPP Historic Resources Mitigation Measure for the <br />Project site, and as such no further CEQA analysis for historic resource impacts is <br />required. <br /> <br />III. The Project Complies with the City’s Adopted Affordable Housing <br />Regulations, and is Not Subject to Payment of Community Benefits <br /> <br />Appellants’ Contentions: Appellant questions the financial difference between the <br />Project’s affordable housing impact fee and the cost it would take to build the affordable <br />housing unit demand created by the project; how the affordable housing impact fee <br />collected from the Project will be used; where the City stands on identifying affordable <br />housing opportunity sites given the requirement to spend the Project’s impact fee on <br />affordable housing; why the Project is not providing inclusionary housing; and why the <br />Project does not have a formalized community benefits package. (See Kris Johnson <br />Appeal, p. 2) <br /> <br />City Response: The City recently developed a framework, known as “Partnership <br />Redwood City,” which includes three distinct objectives: Update development fees and <br />requirements, develop onsite community improvements, and develop of a community <br />fund. The framework was developed to help deliver benefits to the community such as, <br />but not necessarily limited to, affordable housing, improved schools, parks, <br />transportation systems, programs for the arts, and support for special programs and <br />events. It was within this framework that the City embarked upon, and ultimately <br />adopted an affordable housing impact fee. <br /> <br />On December 7, 2015 the City Council adopted an Affordable Housing Impact Fee <br />Ordinance. The Ordinance allows developers to either pay a fee or provide affordable <br />units within their development project. The Impact Fee applies to all development <br />projects that are deemed complete after September 21, 2015, and the fee is imposed <br />on all developers of residential and non-residential development projects (with some <br />limited exemptions for very small-scale development projects and projects that include <br />certain levels of affordable housing units). The Ordinance also established an <br />“Affordable Housing Fund” into which all affordable housing impact fees are to be <br />deposited. All monies in the Affordable Housing Fund are to be expended exclusively <br />8.C. - Page 26
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.