My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1956
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1956
>
CC MIN 1956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 1:34:09 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 10:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1956
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
R O <br />COUNCILMAN ROPER REPORTED ON LOT "A" NEXT TO THE Y.M.C.A. BUILDING ON HUDSON STREET. Councilman Royer <br />reported that it Was the Real Estate Committee's feeling that the property be kept by the City and <br />possibly leased for five year -period to the Y.M.C.A. Councilman Royer moved that this be baken tip <br />by the City Manager to contact the Y.M.C.A. in an effort to obtain the five year lease With the thought <br />in mind that they may lease the area at an amount Which would pay for one half of the assessment, seconded <br />by Councilman Spillers. This Was followed by discussion in regard to the estimated $3,000 street and <br />drainage assessment soon to be levied on this property and Whether or not the City should invest this <br />much more money for the particular lot. Motion carried. <br />FINAL PAYMENT REDWOOD CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, PARKING DISTRICT NO. 19 Carl N. Swenson Co„ Inc., contractor, <br />in the amount of X617,892.04, was ordered paid on motion of Councilman Stout, seconded by Councilman <br />Spillers and carried. <br />COUNTY MANAGER REGARDING PROPOSAL TO CLOSE PORTION OF EAST FULLER STREET. The Clerk read the following letter: <br />SubjedtG Y° Cldure `oaf __a ° Fer$otyot' East FuX1e Sfxeet"" + . <br />• „ ... . L'C,, .. ,..... -. �?. .. ........ ..' (:...... ,:;;3c;1' Zs'. .� ..fir"+'_ ... ...... ::... ,. .? ..... � ,.. . <br />For i me::ttne ,the -_'County+- has � been-consilaning. the poasilaDIty of"'adding *Afe t• r6p@kt#,Cto the <br />block recently acquit adjA0ent,•,,to. t)Ae' Ha31�of'Justiae , Vit'%'forlmgfpu� 6ew�F A .sf&� bt,,; <br />the property - iri . the vicinitlC �.indicates,-that..the<( it ltri lAr portion t#f ` B14di-tiiy _Range T <br />E, Town of `Mezesville, lboimded by. Fuller Street, - Easv Fuller `Stte4ti,-and+&Ai1ton Street, <br />Weald be ideally suited for parking area expansion if the City of Redwood City would agree <br />to the closing of East Fuller Street between Fuller Street and Hamilton Street. <br />The County Manager and the District Attorney have been in frequent conference with <br />representatives of your city regarding the possibility of having this portion of East <br />Fuller Street closed. By closing, it will provide approximately an additional one-half <br />acre of parking and possibly facilitate traffic flow. -Without the closing of this <br />portion of East Fuller, however, the value of the portion of Block 6 to the County would <br />be negligible. <br />It is respectfully requested that you Honorable Council give serious consideration to the <br />closing of East Fuller Street between Fuller Street and Hamilton Street, conditioned upan <br />the County's acquiring portion of Block 6, Range E. Town of Mezesville, as detailed on <br />the attached plat. <br />Councilman Granger stated that he was of the opinion that the City should look favorably upon this and <br />the Council should consider the possibility of a free parking lot. The County will purchase the property <br />and share it with the City. This was followed by discussion in regard to how this would affect the <br />efficiency of the Police and Fire Departments for calls in that particular area. Also under discussion <br />was how the closing of this street would affect the assessed value of the property in the area. City <br />Engineer Jain stated that there was a problem in regard to the utility easements,•the City should ask <br />for this easement as a condition to closing the street. <br />Councilman Granger moved that the Council notify the -Board of Supervisors that they are in favor of <br />joining in the off street parking but there is a problem of drainage and utility easements which should be <br />considered, seconded by Councilman Spillers. Councilman Britschgi questioned the fairness of abandoning <br />this street without notifying the people in the area. City Attorney Currie stated that the Council <br />would have to hold a public hearing if they abondon the street. This was followed by discussion after <br />which the motion carried. <br />PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION -AWARDING AUTOMATIC CROSSING GATES AND POSSIBLE CLOSING OF MAPLE STREET AND CEDAR <br />STREET. The Clerk read the following letter: <br />Subsequent to the Commission's meeting held at San Mateo City Hall on January 199 <br />1956 for the purpose of installing automatic crossing gates or closing the crossings on:: <br />Southern Pacific Company's San Francisco -San Jose line, a meeting between represent- <br />atives of'.the City of Redwood City, Southern Pacific Company and this Commission was <br />held in the City Manager's office at Redwood City to plan a program for the proposed <br />installation of automatic crossing gates and/or the closing of railroad crossings at <br />grade within the city limits of Redwood City. During the informal discussion among <br />all participants at the conference, matters condidered were: vehicular traffic delay, <br />safety, future street plans, length of railroad trains; approximate number of <br />automatic crossing gate installations, priority list of streets where automatic <br />crossing gates will be installed and the proposed closing of crossings. <br />It appeared feasible that the city participate in the proposed installation of <br />automatic crossing gates at the rate of two crossings per year, the priority of the <br />proposed installations being as follows: <br />D <br />G <br />E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.