My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1956
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1956
>
CC MIN 1956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 1:34:09 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 10:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1956
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This condition prevailed throughout the city, particulary in the older sections where <br />sewer mains of inadequate capacity were constructed many years ago. The large interceptor <br />mains constructed with 1951 bond funds, have relieved this condition, except during peak <br />storms such as occurred in December. This was aggravated this season by the fact that the <br />continuous rains have so saturated the ground that infiltration into the sanitary sewer <br />system was much greater than normally occurs. Much of the overflow, in our opinion, has <br />occurred because of illegal drainage pipes from private property, pumping of basements by <br />individual property owners into sanitary sewers, and other activities beyond our control. <br />Although the reconstruction of inadequate sewer lines throughout the city would be <br />desirable, it would be very costly and would necessaryily be financed from an additional <br />bond issue. In our opinion, these conditions could not be corrected by small local projects, <br />except in very isolated eases, without reconstructing the entire main in any particular area. <br />We are returning the letter received from Mr. Howell for you further consideration. <br />Glenn M. Jain <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REQUESTED THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE MAKING A REVISION OF THE 1916-47 LAND USE PLAN AND STREET <br />AND HIGHWAY PLAN at an estimated cost of $5,000.00, and to provide for annual revision of these plans at <br />a cost not to exceed $1,000.00 per year. The Planning Commission feels that it is very improtant and <br />urgent that these two plans be brought up to date so that the Planning Commission can have an adequate <br />guide to work with, and so that the City can grasp in a reasonably orderly manner. <br />Councilman Jones stated that the City was in need of a revision of the Master Plan, and he was of the <br />opinion that the Planning Commission should tell us what they want. Councilman Britschgi was of the <br />opinion that the Council should first decide as to what to do with this and then have the City Manager <br />and the City Attorney obtain bids. This was followed by discussion. Councilman Jones moved to proceed <br />with the change in the Master Plan, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. This was followed by discussion <br />as to what the bids would cover. Councilman Jones changed the motion to have the City Manager make a <br />thorough investigation as to what the City will receive for the $5,000.00 and report back at the next <br />Council meeting.* seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. <br />LETTERS PROTESTING USE PERMIT GRANTED TO ODDSTAD TO OPERATE MERCURY PROCESSING PLANT AT HARBOR. The Clerk <br />read the letter from the Planning Commission wherein they allowed the use permit subject to : <br />le That the operation conform to any conditions imposed by any pollution district to be <br />formed in the future. <br />2. That the operation be closed down at order of County Health Department on inversion <br />layer days or any other danger period specified by the County Health Department. <br />The Clerk read two letters of protest because of the health and welfare of residents of an area from <br />5 to 10 miles radius from the Dumbarton Fair Oaks Improvement Association, Inc. and from Me Paul Traver, <br />410 Flynn Avenue. <br />Councilman Royer moved to set this for a public hearing on April 2nd. Cy Peletz, Oddstad representative, <br />stated that Mr. Ranklim-,p from the Foundry Company, was present and would like to speak on the subject <br />tonight as he would be in Spain during the time of the public hearing. The motion was seconded by <br />Councilman Britschgi and carried. Mr. John Connors, representing Dumbarton Improvement Club, asked for <br />more than two weeks to obtain information, suggesting 30 days. This was followed by discussion and it <br />was agreed that Mr. Rankin. would submit highlights of his report in writing to the City Council. <br />Mrs C. S. Rankin, engineer for Pacific Foundry Company in San Francisco, stated that in the 25 years thA <br />he has worked for his company they have built from 35 to 40 plants, one in Spain being the largest in <br />the world. During these twenty-five years Mrs Rankin has never come in contact with the health problem <br />of anyone contacting poisoning from the mercury fumes. He stated examples of this by using for an <br />example the fact that there are cases where factory workers live within a few hundred feet of the plants. <br />Another example is shown by the fact that insurance is easily obtainable to the plants and if there were <br />any danger involved there would be difficulty in securing the proper insurance. Mrs Rankin went on to <br />explain the extent of the obnoxious fumes which comes from the oxidation of the sulpher. SO -2 is the <br />name of the gas which will throw off an odor which can be calculated by any engineer. SO -2 is a <br />permanent gas and it dissipates and the further away the greater the dissipation. Councilman Jones again <br />0 <br />rwn <br />a" <br />LJ <br />0 <br />w- W- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.