My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1956
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1956
>
CC MIN 1956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 1:34:09 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 10:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1956
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
on the -thinking of the Commission when they insisted on having these extra large lots and he wanted to <br />know why this wasn't brought up at this time., This was followed by considerable discussion after which <br />the motion carried. <br />Councilman Granger wanted to know how long the City was going to allow the present condition of Canyon <br />Road. This was referred to the City Engineer for checking. City Engineer Jain stated that ditch should <br />be resurfaced sometime this week.. <br />PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENTS, BAY ROAD. CITY ENGINEER RECOV24ENDATION. A petition has been received from <br />property owners adjacent to Bay Road, requesting full street improvements on Bay Road between Willow Street <br />and Kaynyne Street. This petition represents 59.3% of the property frontage on the portion of Bay Road <br />proposed to be improved. Only the northerly ten feet on Bay Road lies within the incorporated area of <br />FoZ <br />Redwood City, with the exception of the 78 feet adjacent to Kaynyne Street. The rest of Bay Road lies <br />rwI <br />in unincorporated territorye <br />It is the recommendation of the Engineering Department that the City Council approve the formation of an <br />, assessment district for these improvements, and that this petition be presented to the County of San <br />Mateo to process the plans and spe cfications, and the formation of the assessment district under a joint <br />project between the City and the County for the following reasons: <br />1. All except ten feet of the street, with the exception noted above, lies in <br />unincorporated territory. <br />2. The only affected property owners who did not sign the petition are in <br />unincorporated territory. <br />3. The necessary widening of Bay Road as a Major Street to conform to the rest <br />of Bay Road adjacent to the Redwood Industrial Tracts, and through Friendly Acres, would <br />necessarily be the responsibility, and under the jurisdiction of the County. <br />This matter has been discussed with Mr. Don Milson, Deputy County Engineer. <br />Councilman Stout moved approval of the City Engineer's report, seconded by Councilman Jones and carried. <br />REPORT ON BID OPENING, PURCHASE OF CHAIRS AND TABLES, MEMORIAL BUILDING. City Manager Rolison asked to have "me <br />this postponed for two weeks. Councilman Granger moved to place this on the agenda for two weeks, seconded <br />by Councilman Stout and carried. <br />REPORT ON BID OPENING, RESURFACE STR'ETS VICINITY JUSTICE BUILDING. It was the recommendation that the low <br />bid of Sandgroth Brothers Construction Compar;y, in the total amount of $92471.00 be accepted. Payment <br />for this improvement is to be made from the appropriation for supplies and services in the 1955-56 Street <br />Maintenance Budget. Councilman Spillers moved to accept the City Engineer's report and accept.the bid of <br />Sandgroth Brothers, seconded by Councilman Britschgie Douglas & Woodhouse's bid was incomplete. Motion <br />carried. <br />PETITION KENDINGTON SQUARE RESIDENTS REGARDING CONDITION OF SIDEWALKS. City Engineer Jain reported that <br />many people who signed the petition did not have any cracks in the sidewalk. They found very few major <br />cracks and a few minor cracks. This was followed by general discussion after which Councilman Royer moved <br />that the City Engineer check into this and try to repair some of the cracks as best as possible, second— <br />ed by Councilman Britschgi and carried. <br />DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS REGARDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL WOODSIDE ROAD AND HUDSON STREET. In their letter, the <br />Division of Highways stated that they had completed a traffic signal study of this intersection and are <br />sorry that they cannot recommend installation of traffic signals at the present time dine to insufficient <br />warrants. However, they will keep the intersection under observation and if conditions should chnage <br />they will reconsider a signal installation. Councilman Spillers was of the opinion that this should be <br />sent back to the State telling them that their report was not acceptable. Captain Moudakas reported <br />that the Police Department survey agreed with that of the State. It appears that conditions have changed <br />since the last survey. He further explained that the State requirements are such that the cross traffic <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.