Laserfiche WebLink
474 <br /> roll call with Councilman Granger being noted absent. <br /> Councilman Spillers offered RESOLUTION 2240 WAIVING PROVISIONS OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION <br /> AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931, AS AMENDED (Farm Hill Boulevard) and moved its adoption, seconded by <br /> Councilman Stout and carried on roll call, Councilman Granger being noted absent. <br /> The Mayor acknowledged receipt of a petition with 298 signatures protesting and opposing any change in zoning <br /> regulations that will permit apartments to be built in Farm Hills. <br /> CITY OF SAN CARLOS REGARDING PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, UNRECORDED MAP OF EATON AVENUE VILLAS. The City <br /> of San Carlos stated that it would not be possible for them to permit connections to the sewers on the <br /> basis that Redwood City recommended, namely 60¢ per residential unit. They feel that the most satisfact- <br /> ory arrangement would be for the City of San Carlos to annex this property, and that would eliminate all <br /> existing problems. If the property is not annexed to San Carlos, and still desires to connect to their <br /> sewer system it would require a fee of $500 per connection. <br /> Councilman Stout was of the opinion that the people in the area should be appraised of the situation. <br /> This was followed by discussion. Mr. Toffanelli asked if this matter could be held up until later in the <br /> evening. Mr. Charles Rafdlett was to appear to talk on the matter but he had to attend a meeting in Wood- <br /> side first. <br /> FURTHER CONSIDERATION PROPOSED ANNEXATION, FARM HILLS ADDITION NO. 1. The City Attorney asked that this be held <br /> up another week and he further stated that this should have been considered under public hearings. Coun- <br /> cilman Stout moved to continue the public hearing for one week, May 27th, seconded by Councilman Weymouth <br /> and carried. <br /> CITY COLLECTOR REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO CANCEL WEED AND REAL PROPERTY TAXES. The Clerk read the letter wherein <br /> it was stated that most of these assessments were charged against properties in the name of the City of <br /> Redwood City, San Mateo County, and State of California. The cancellations read as follows <br /> Arb. Description ' Ask for Cancellation <br /> Vol. 1 Taxes Weed Tax. <br /> 69-7F Tax deed - City $12.40 $ 7.15 <br /> Vol. 2 <br /> 110-19 Tax deed - City 3.64 <br /> 132-2 Church Prop. Exemption 34.10 <br /> 183-9 State of California 4.52 <br /> Vol. 3 <br /> 203-9 City - Creek lot 7.71 <br /> 203-10 " " w 7.71 <br /> 203-23 " " It 7.71 <br /> 203-24 " " " 7.71 <br /> 241-2 e " " 6.29 <br /> 242-1 " Sold to Wm. Mora 13.82 <br /> 243-1 " Creek lot 14.20 <br /> 243-2 * " " 5•46 <br /> 243•18 a " 5.02 "* <br /> 245-10 " n 6.39 <br /> umid <br /> Vol. 4 <br /> 253-6H City 9.31 <br /> 254-3G Deeded to City, 25' for Street 5.44 5.02 <br /> 267-1 Tax deed to City 8.11 <br /> " <br /> 268-12 " " " 16.68 <br /> vol. 5 <br /> woo <br /> 365-1 City prop. for parking lot, from Joe Ross 487.94 <br /> 365-5 " " Lombardino 4.75 <br /> 365-6A " " from Joe Ross 219.23 <br /> 365- " Parking lot 7.50 <br /> 368-3 " " ". " 32.49 <br /> 377-16 " " Marshall Street 3.71 <br /> 379-3 " " " " 25.53 <br /> 404-2 " " 5.00 <br /> 503H-7D " " Industrial Way 11.78 <br /> 514 State Property - Bayshore 18.50 <br />