CC MIN 1959 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

of the area should be by annexation to San Carlos. He spoke about the proximity of fire and police, trans— portation_, drainage and sewage. He asked that San Carlos, Redwood City and Leslie Salt Company sit down and work out a better plan for all concerned. Urban Schreiner, representing Press Wireless and NBC, stated the reasons why his clients did not want to be included in the annexation proceedings as follows: (1) One of Planninge They realize that annex— ation will cause development of the area soon and because of possible transmission trouble Press Wireless does not want to see the area developed. (2) Financial* He referred to the high assessed valuation im- posed upon Press Wireless wherein they are classified and assessed as a public utility. They would not re— ceive any benefits for the increase in the tax dollar if taken into Redwood Citye ' George Tiegel, President of the Belmont Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Council"and stated the reasons for their proteste Councilman Weymouth moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried. Councilman Granger moved adoption of RESOLUTION Noe 2771 DETERMINING THE VALUE OF TIDE OR SUBMEMED LANDS INCLUDED WITHIN THE TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF'REgffOOD CITY KNOWN AS "LESLIE ANNEXATION Noe 2," seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried on roll callp Councilman Spillers and Mayor Royer being noted absent. Councilman Herkner moved adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2772 DETERMINING THE VALUE OF PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, DESIGNATED AS"LESLIE ANNEXATION NO. 2," seconded by Councilman Granger and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers and Mayor Royer being noted absent* Count ilman Weymouth moved adoption of RESOLUTION Noe 2773 CF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF REDWOOD CITY FIND* ING AND DETERMINING THAT PROTEST TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY CF REDWOOD CITY CF CERTAIN UNINodew — HABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS "LESLIE ANNEXATION N0, 2" HAS NOT BEEN MADE BY CRIERS OF ONE—HAIF OF THE VALUE CF PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY AS SHOWN BY THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL, NOR BY THE OWNERS OF ONE—HAIF OF THE VALUE OF PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY WITHIN SAID TERRITORY AS DETERMINED BY SAID COUNCIL, seconded by Councilman Rosselli. This was followed by discussion on the percentage of protests* The motion carried on roll call with Councilman Spillers and Mayor Royer being noted absent. Councilman Weymouth moved introduction of an ordinance to the City of Redwood City approving the annexation to the City of Redwood City of certain uninhabited territory designated "Leslie Annexation Noe 2," and herein described, and herein annexing said territory to said City of Redwood City (MINUTE ORDER #59-111), seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers and Mayor Royer being noted absent. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ON LESLIE ANNEXATION NO. 3e The City Assessor submitted a report showing the public property assessed valuation as follows. San Mateo County, 2 acres MOL bounded tm East by Harbor Boulevard, Northerly land of P. Ge & Eo,, South and West by Leslie Salt Company as $300.00- This report was ordered filed. The City Clerk and the City Manager stated that they had nothing to report on this proceeding. Councilman Rosselli moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried. Councilman Granger moved adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2774 DETERMINING THE VALUE OF PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY WITHIN THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, DESIDNATED AS "LESLIE ANNEXATION NO. 3," r seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers and Mayor Royer being noted absent. Councilman Herkner moved adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 2775 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PROTEST TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY OF'CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITCQY DESIGNATED AS '"LESLIE ANNEXATION N0. 3" HAS NOT BEEN MADE BY OWNERS OF ONE—HALF CF THE VALUE OP PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH TERRITORY AS SHOWN BY THE LAST ]QUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL, NOR BY THE OWNERS CF