CC MIN 1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

� n�MM�M�IM � Ir11fqII�IIl111�iI�lY� 4 � 9 � �Me,,o► Mlohssl J.Bvrot1 � M I N U T E S vloe M�yor e�u Rhodee C 1 TY COUNC I L counoumsn �� �o�.� � Howard Johnson Motor Lodge RobsrtH.Bury 485 Yeterans B1vd. �°�R��°� Monday, Merch 12, 1979 Marpusrlb Lelpzlp Bob NortU „e�„ AGENDA ACTI ON TAKEN ��, Ad�ourned Regular Meeting Adjourned Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER 9:25 a.m., Mayor Barrett presiding. Councilmen resent: Biag1, Norris (arrived 9: a.m. , o� and Mayor $arrett Councilmen absent: Bury, Chandler, Leipzig ic a s an staff resent: Fales, Schricker, Sm t , erence, e rand—and Schroeter APPROYAL OF MINUTES - (Considered out of order. Action delayed until City Council Meeting� Mlairch 5, 1979 quorum present) Adfourned Meeting, March 6, 1979 M/S: Biagi/Rhodes to approve the subject Ad�ourned Meeting, March 8, 1979 Minutes as submitted. Carried unanimously by voice vote. STUDY SESSION - Housing and Comnunity Development Strategy Assistant City Manager Sm1th presented information on Housing and Comnunity Development Strategy using a flip chart to indtcate federal and city purposes. He reviewed possible city programs and sources of funds and federal objectives. Mr. Smith distributed copies of a list of available housing programs with a sumnary of the conditions under whlch each program might be used. He also distributed copies of a memorandum from himself to the Downtown Task Force dated May 2, 1977 relating to the California Comnunity Redevelop- ment Act. Mr. Smith continued use of the flip chart and comnented concerning the definition of "redevelopment" and when it might occur, noting State policy is indicated in the appro- ►t�» priate Code. ' Planning Director Schroeter described the provisions of the Marks-Foran Residential Act W. b of 1973, as amended, which might relate to city action with regard to rehabilitation. He observed that it is designed to work with the Community Development B1ock Grant Program, although the programs need not be tied together. Mr. Schroeter advised that Marks-Foran allows loans up to E35,000 wtth a 40-year payout period, stating that for single-family homes, 80� of the loan must be used for direct rehabilitation wfth the remaining 20� allowed for cosmetic rehabilitation such as painting, fencing, etc. Where multi-family residences are concerned, 60� must be spent on rehabilltation and 40% may be spent for cosmetic treatment of the property, noting that, in any case, each indi- vidual property is considered separately and certain flexibility exists. In response to question relating to the necessary bonds, Mr. Smith advised that there is a bond surplus now which may change if interest rates drop. City Attorney Schrtcker noted that the bonds would have more flexibility with regard to interest rate then District bonds. In response to question, Mr. Schroeter advised the procedure by which the rehabititation area will be designated. He noted that property owners in the designated area would have their property inspected with regard to the required safety standards, and would Adj.Reg.Mtg. . 3/12/79 Page 1 � �1rw r�, f .�Y✓ ��