Laserfiche WebLink
, �. _ �. 0 '7 <br /> City Attc�r�ey Schricker alsc� �t�,t�� for *��a r�:�c�rd t;h�.�; hi.s <br /> remarks wcauld �enerally r�fer to both af 1,he appr�.1s oi` Planr,�n� <br /> Commission denials of Tentative �u}�div�si.an Map; . <br /> „�,,, Davi� Van At�a, Miller, Starr & R��aZ�.a, Oaklan�, Calif�.rnia, <br /> a orney or aker-Crow �om a:7y, t,h� a�>pella,r�',�, referr�� ,;c� Y�i:; <br /> appeal letter of May �, 1�7�. Mr. Va.n Atta st:at;ed hi� �;el.ie#' <br /> "`�"' that the mandated time requir�zn���ts of. the Stzbdi��.^ion Ur��:ira<znr�.- <br /> and the Subdivision Map Act were, not met. Mr. Van �tta sta�„�d; <br /> that the 31-unit a,pE�,rtment co:r�p�e�x for whi�:h ap�lication c,�:�::: <br /> made for convers�.an to ccndomirsiums was can�vruct�d irz r�.v,:cord�,ric� <br /> with applicable Codes ir. exist�nc�. ��.t that tirn� an� su�;�e�tPd <br /> certain provisions of the z�aninb �nd b�ildin� coc�es �nact�a <br /> after construct.�on da not r�.�pl.y. l�.r. �T�n Atta ur�ed rever,�a1. c�� <br /> the Planning Comm3ssian d�ci:;ion and �.�pr�v�.l of the s�abj��t <br /> application. <br /> Discussion fallowed an� comments were made con�ernin� the Plan.- <br /> ning Commissic�n concern; �wit�h r.egard ta vpen spa��, parkin� and <br /> the sl�pe of the �.ite. <br /> City Mana.ger Fales comment�d on parl�ing arran�em,ents anci the <br /> possibility of thP City� s bein� drav�n into controversy a,r��n�; the <br /> prospective condomin.;.um awnE,rs �°:lth xegat°d tc� enforcetri�r.t �f <br /> rules regardin�; m�i.ntenance, etr . <br /> City �ttorney Schricker s#;at�d that the �ays w�re c�unted <br /> correctly with re�;ard to time requir�me�ts. Mr. Schri�k.er stated <br /> that it ha;� been su��est�d �;hat the Pla�ning Commission c�ic� not <br /> �- have jazrisdict�.on to deny the su3�ject rec�ues� ira that in doing <br /> sa th�y con�idered matters at'�er. �han thos� upon which their <br /> ,,,� decisinn must be mad�, but su�.�h i.s no�t the ca,s� �,s th� law does <br /> not requir� ic?le acts, i.e. °1ruYal�er stampir�g" cf ap�l3cations. <br /> Di�cussian con�t.�_nuc.� coc�c�;t2n��°,�, the p�:�rr�:n��.�� �.-�f t�nants 1..�ke1� <br /> ta purchase condom-.�r�i.um u�ia.t;s; t�x� :z;or�thl,y r�r��,t �f ;uc� Lcr•�it::, ir� <br /> relation to pres�nt r�nts; the ui^pc�sition c�f t�na�t;� ;�f th� <br /> ap�rtment house who do nat choose t� pur�ha:e a uri.L s�rith ���;.:�r� <br /> to not�ce and assistane� in f�,rlc�,-�ng �.nother a�a�t��n�:n;��; t�he n�ed <br /> for a jud�mer�t;al decisi�n ba��:i �n i.�i�ntif��.b:l.�� r�����rxs with <br /> r��arti to the �ppl.�.ration; �,r;� �;��e �,�.k�l.�hc�r�d �f ad�a�:�r�ncc; �c� <br /> mai.n��nanc� �►ra�siwiai�a a� c�?r.;c�.,��x�3.niu:m, c�wner•;. � rf_���zld�i�r,�. <br /> Discussion c�nf:�iriued ccane�rr:.ir�� t::i� x Gqu:i.r�:��i ct::>v�rz�,nt�, c�c�r�i;.�i� <br /> tions �,nd restx•:i.ctions �.nd i�.r. Sct�ricl�er, t"r. V�.:rr Ai:ta �zr;�:� <br /> R:�chard McKir�nan r�f �3akPr-Crow ccammG�xlt�c3 ��I .�•e�rliz.>d t,o c��acut,:.�:.:tr;:a <br /> concernin� the nature of su^Y:; re��uir�r+��r{f;;:; . <br /> Mr. Van Atta �t���e�teci �h�.t �it.� �. L�.�"�' t7�i ;ri�: v:�.�Yl �:.0 c c�,��:� j•at�; <br /> in drafting t�x�: C�F�H� i'r�r �h� �:�rc>�o:��d c:�z�c.i�:�rr,:�ni.tzma �.c.;� r,:r,���. <br /> approva� of th� Tenta�i�ve �.,�.��i<�:i.vi.�ic,n P�iag� c:«r,t�ng���:ri� u�;c::�n fii��:;� <br /> appr�v�,l af t;he�r,. <br /> MOTION: Cc,uncilman Tr�i.l.lia;ns rr�v��, �f�c:ot�3�c� k�y Ccaur�c�.l�m�.n. l�Yir,sd�:s� <br /> �"" to continue �he r�att�r to Jun� 3 in o:�d�>� �cr �c�la� c�ecisiorr Qn <br /> � the item and �o ini;o Executl.u� Sr:��sion in c�rd�r to get the �dvj�c:� <br /> �+ af the City �.t�orn�y. <br /> Reg,.Mtg. <br /> 5/20/7�+ <br /> , �- <br /> _ .�,, W- _ <br />