Laserfiche WebLink
��..____:..�,� _._._. _____ .,� .���� _�__. . _ <br /> � 2 �- 6 � � � <br /> i <br /> ' Oral Communications (continued) <br /> , <br /> and read a list of alleged offenses of those per- <br /> � sons. Mr. Litteer acknowledged the Police Depart- <br /> , ment had investigated, and suggested offenses had <br /> increased. � <br /> Mayor Weymouth requested staff to investigate the ,� <br /> matter. (Memo 9/17/7�) <br /> 2. John Crevelt, 1�34 Mitche 11, Save Our Recreational <br /> Lanc�commented on the status of the Santa Clara <br /> Avenue property of the School District which his <br /> organi2ation would like to have obtained for open <br /> space. Mr. Crevelt invited Council members to <br /> compare the school property with that mentioned <br /> for possible acquisition on Valota Road at a <br /> later d�,te. Mr. Crevelt stated he has knowledge <br /> ', of the possibility of 5096 funding by the federal <br /> ', government of the City' s purchase of the Santa <br /> ; Clara Avenue property. <br /> � City Attorney Schricker questioned the propriety <br /> i of the Council's investigating property on Valota <br /> � Road about which the City has not communicated to <br /> � the owner any interest in the site. <br /> ' Executive Session <br /> MOTION: Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by '"�`"" <br /> Councilman Leipzig, that the Council ad�ourn to <br /> e"�cecutive session. �� <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> , The Council ad�ourned to executive session at 12 :40 a.m. <br /> ; The Council returned to regular session at 1:20 a.m. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Williams moved, seconded by Council-. <br /> man Henderson, to approve the recommendation of the <br /> Mayor and Vice Mayor with respect to ad,justment of <br /> compensation of the City Controller. <br /> � The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> � (MINUTE ORDER N0. 7�-182) <br /> ' MOTION: Councilman Leipzig moved, seconded by Council- <br /> s <br /> man Williams, to authorize the law firm of Hanson, <br /> Bridgett, Marcus & Jenkins of San Francisco to repre- <br /> sent the City of Redwood City in conjunction with other <br /> Ba.y Area purchasers of water from the City and County <br /> of San Francisco against the City and County of San <br /> I Francisco to contest that City' s arbitrary, unreason- «� <br /> able and un�ustly discriminatory different�al water <br /> rate increase to be imposed upon Bay Area water pur- ,�„ <br /> chasers and other actions and activities of that City <br /> in connection therewith. <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. - <br /> (MINUTE ORDF.�t N0. 7�-183) <br /> —13— <br /> Reg.Mt . <br /> 9/16/7� <br /> �W � <br /> � o. ��---� — .�...,� ..— , ,�. <br /> r� �� �w �. _.. �. � — <br />