CC MIN 1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

271 an engineer , plus answers to future zoning , type of im- provements proposed to preserve rural atmosphere , esti- mate of costs on any assessment . He again advised that although he had a protest on file , he would prefer that hearing be continued , as felt annexation and future im- provements inevitable . Mr . Henry Miller , 622 Vista Drive , owner of Lot 5 , with lack of access to Laurel Way , advised of his having con- sulted an engineer for purpose of having a planning de - sign of his property , which would take some six weeks to prepare and present for unofficial approval at least . Mrs . Alice Thompson , 4 Greenwood Place , co -owner of Lot 2 , protested suggested access to Mr . Miller ' s property by extension of the cul-de -sac , Discussion held concerning access to Mr . Miller ' s property , Director of Public Works advising of theCity ordinance prohibiting a steeper road grade than 15% . Councilman Petersen moved to continue this public hearing to February 24 , 1969 , seconded by Councilman Keckley . It was pointed out motion to include intent that Staff will meet with those involved in this proceeding to answer any questions relating to annexation , as evidence presented during hearing indicated , cooperation could be had to resolve the problems involved . Mayor Bury noted again City Attorney ' s statement that should problems be re - solved before next hearing on this annexation , protestants could withdraw their protests by a written statement to this effect , and expressed hope that this would be done . Motion carried , ( MINUTE ORDER #69-9 ) PUBLIC HEARING , Resolution of Intention to Annex, EDGEWOOD ROAD ANNEXATION NO , 1 , declared open and affidavit of publication and mailing ordered filed . It was noted Council had previously adopted the Resolution of Intention to annex this area after approval by the LAFC ; that area is comprised of five parcels , in- cluding the Rossi property , for which a sewer connection permit had previously been granted , conditioned upon the annexation . City Clerk reported a letter of protest had been received from Mr . and. .Mrs . Christian Hagnere , 1381 Edgewood Road . It was noted this protest represented only an 8 . 97% of the total assessed valu- ation of the property proposed for annexation , Council was reminded that some of the parcels in this annexation were included in a much larger annexation some years ago under an election procedure which had lost , but that repeated requests had been received since that time from isolated parcels requesting an- nexation besides sewer connection permits prior to annexation . There being no further communications or oral protests , Councilman Rosselli moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman Keckley . Councilman Hender- son noted specific statement in letter of protest from Mrs . Hagnere which she felt should be answered by Staff relating to possibility of "match box " dwellings resulting from annexation . Mrs . Christian Hagnere , 1381 Edgewood Road , appeared to question , if annexation approved , when it would be ef- fective and what advantages would result . City Attorney advised that thirty days after adoption of the ordinance and subse - quent certification by the Secretary of State the annexation would be complete . an x ;