Laserfiche WebLink
244 <br /> already been held with PG&E and PT&T who had agreed to this abandonment of a <br /> portion of Douglas Avenue and would extend their utilities to the site pro - <br /> posed for the Corporate Tower, but that further reports would be given at the <br /> public hearing . <br /> In reply to questions concerning portions of Broadway which Ampex had re- <br /> quested City to abandon , also , City Manager advised this had been discussed <br /> but that their proposed designs for expansion not predicated on this phase . <br /> Ampex is initially interested in evidence of interest by Council and community <br /> to do what was necessary with Douglas Avenue and give them sufficient assur- <br /> ances so that they could retain architects for site design and plans for <br /> their Corporate Tower . He assured Council that Staff would continue with <br /> their studies of the second phase of requested abandonment and would make a <br /> recommendation to Council . He also reviewed tentative plans for Douglas Avenue <br /> after a portion had been abandoned , and of the contact made with the State <br /> Division of Highways concerning extension of the Douglas loop as a frontage <br /> road , and of channelization planning for Douglas and Broadway . <br /> Mayor Bury questioned whether this first stage , if approved by Council , would <br /> in anywise compromise future action relating to the Broadway proposals of <br /> Ampex Corporation , as he felt he was not prepared for such commitment at this <br /> time . City Manager assured Council that Ampex representatives would appear <br /> at the public hearing set for abandonment of Douglas Avenue and present their <br /> proposals , and stated his belief that this action in no way placed the <br /> Council in a compromised position as far as the proposed plans for Broadway . <br /> Motion carried on roll call vote . <br /> Councilmam Arnett moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO , 5887 ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE FOR <br /> THE USE OF THE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES BUILDING; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO . <br /> 5326 , seconded by Councilman Rosselli . It was noted Council had referred this <br /> to the Park and Recreation Commission with a request that a more equitable rate <br /> charge for groups be developed than that which had been presented to Council <br /> on September 16 , 1968 . City Manager ' s report to Council indicated the rate <br /> changes which had been made in compliance with Council ' s request . Motion <br /> carried on roll call vote . <br /> Councilman Rosselli moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO , 5888 BEING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION <br /> TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE <br /> PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ' 'RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br /> CITY , seconded by Councilman Arnett , <br /> Staff report stated this amendment would provide the employee fringe benefits <br /> authorized by Council relating to the 1957-59 Retirement Acts . Auditor-Account- <br /> ant answered Council ' s questions concerning further details of this amendment <br /> to City ' s Retirement System Contract with the State , in that proposal would be <br /> available to all present employees who elected to participate , but mandatory <br /> to future employees ; that amendment scheduled for an effective date of April <br /> 1st , however , inasmuch as this was only a Resolution of Intention , future <br /> action by the Council would be required ; explained how benefits affected <br /> only dependents of deceased employee , minor children , widow , or possibly widower , <br /> if dependency proven . <br /> jr 27 '69 <br />