Laserfiche WebLink
245 <br /> MINUTES OF REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING <br /> REDWOOD CITY COUNCIL <br /> DECEMBER 14 , 1936 <br /> g : 00 o ' clock P . M. <br /> Upon roll call , the following Councilmen were present : Mayor Paul A. McCarthy , L. C. Christensen , <br /> J . M. Eva , E. A. Fletcher , R. N. Jones , G. W. McNulty and City Clerk , B. E. Myers. Absent : <br /> Councilman Wm. Hokin. <br /> Councilman Fletcher , seconded by Councilman Eva , proposed the adoption of the following resolution <br /> in connection with the activities of certain groups operating to have P . W.A. refuse contribu- <br /> tions toward the new office building for San Mateo County , protesting such action and request- <br /> ing copies of resolution to be sent to the Board of Supervisors , P . W.A . officials and other <br /> City Councils , Unanimously carried. <br /> WHEREAS a resolution has been adopted by an Improvement Club of the City of <br /> San Mateo expressing its opposition to necessary enlargement of the office facilities <br /> and construction of a new building for the conducting of business of certain depart- <br /> ments of the County of San Mateo adjacent to the Court House at Redwood City, and again <br /> urging the removal of the County Seat to the City of San Mateo; and <br /> WHEREAS the County Seat of San Mateo County has been located at Redwood City <br /> for 80 years and the County has invested more than $300 ,000 in a Court House and a <br /> separate building for the Sheriff' s office and County Jail in Redwood City , and an <br /> abandonment thereof would cause the loss of a very substantial part of said investment <br /> by reason of the inadaptability of either of said buildings for any purposes other <br /> than that for which they are designed and built ; and <br /> WHEREAS the great increase of the population of San Mateo County since the <br /> construction of said building necessitates gradual extension of office space and the <br /> construction of new buildings adjacent to said Court House for the construction of <br /> the first of which a substantial grant has been made by Public Works Administration <br /> of the United States which will greatly minimize the cost of such building to the <br /> taxpayers of San Mateo County , and therefore should be availed of promptly; and <br /> WHEREAS the great improvement in highways and facilities for transportation <br /> has rendered the present Court House much more accessible today than when originally <br /> established in Redwood City , and the trend of population has been and will be for many <br /> years southerly in San Mateo County; and <br /> WHEREAS the City of Redwood City is a focal point for citizens of the whole <br /> County by reason of numerous highways centering in Redwood City as a hub, all of which <br /> facts render any change of the County Seat uneconomical , wasteful , unnecessary and un- <br /> desirable ; <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, EE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redwood <br /> City does hereby deprecate the continued agitation for a change of the County Seat of <br /> San Mateo County and respectfully request the Public Works Administration of the United <br /> States and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo to regard the location <br /> of the County Seat thereof as permanently settled; that efforts to disturb the loca- <br /> tion of the County Seat be discouraged and that the proposed grant to the County of <br /> San Mateo by the Public Works Administration of the United States to aid. said County <br /> in providing additional office space conveniently accessible to the Court House be <br /> based upon a determination that said County Seat at Redwood City is permanent ; <br /> FURTHER RESOLVED that copy of this resolution duly certified by the Clerk <br /> of the City Council of Redwood City be sent to the Public Works Administration of <br /> the United States and to the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo . <br /> The Redwood Highlands Company submitted letter accompanied by map requesting permission to divide <br /> Lot 5 , Block 14 , of Oak Knoll Manor , into five parcels. The request had been before the <br /> Planning Commission and received its approval , so Councilman Fletcher , seconded by Councilman <br /> Eva, proposed that the Council grant permission to divide this lot as requested, with the <br /> provision that there should be one house only to a lot and not more than five houses , and <br /> that the map be filed with the City Assessor. (The subdivision as shown appears on the <br /> records of the City Assessor but the map itself is filed in the City Engineer ' s office. ) <br /> L . E. Werder , representing the owner of the laundry building on Jefferson Avenue , appeared before <br />