Reso PC16-16 0091 PC Reso Approving the PC Permit & TM - Phase 1 Stanford

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0091/PC RESO APPROVING THE PC PERMIT & TM - PHASE 1 STANFORD REV: 09-29-16 JS Page 3 of 15 e. Pursuant to Guidelines section 15091(e) (Findings), the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission has based its decision are located in and may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City. Section 3. Planned Community Permit PC2016-001: The proposed Project includes office development and amenity and supporting buildings. Offsite improvements and other implementation measures are included in the project consistent with the requirements of the Stanford in Redwood City Precise Plan. The Planning Commission finds that, with the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A), the project is consistent with the Precise Plan goals, development standards, and urban design guidelines. Section 4. Tentative Map TM2016-002: The project requires approval of a Tentative Map per the Subdivision Ordinance. The Planning Commission finds that: a. The map, design, and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the City of Redwood City’s General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, Stanford in Redwood City Precise Plan, and all applicable subdivision improvements requirements; and b. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suited for the type and density of the proposed development as the site is flat with adequate transportation and utility infrastructure and is surrounded on three sides by light industrial and office uses; and c. The design and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems; as the proposed development has been evaluated by an EIR and any proposed environmental impacts have been identified and mitigated to the extent possible; and d. The design and proposed improvements of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision as the project increases public access through the site and makes adequate provisions for all required utility easements; and e. No exceptions are requested from the requirements of the subdivision ordinance; and f. The proposed subdivision does not conflict with written public policy or with the public interest. Section 5. Conditionally Granted: The Planned Community Permit, including the Right-of-Way Exception and the Building Height Exception, and Tentative Map are hereby conditionally granted based on the Planning Commission’s consideration and reliance on the Consistency Checklist, EIR, Precise Plan and in accordance with the plans, details and descriptions contained therein, and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A) and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for Phase 1 (Exhibit B), both attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 6. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption. * * *