My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-10-24 Closed and Joint SA PFA HHCC
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-10-24 Closed and Joint SA PFA HHCC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2016 4:45:27 PM
Creation date
10/20/2016 5:13:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/24/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
350
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.A. - Page 2 <br /> source. Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, often used to <br /> support housing-related needs, have also been reduced during the same time period. <br /> The City Council held a "Managing Growth" Study Session on February 8, 2016. <br /> Affordable housing was the topic discussed at greatest length. The Council directed that <br /> two separate processes be undertaken: <br /> 1) The Housing and Human Concerns Committee should hold community <br /> meetings and report back to the City Council with tenant protection <br /> recommendations and other affordable housing policy recommendations. The <br /> finding of this process are the subject of a separate report; and <br /> 2) Staff and the Finance and Audit Committee should summarize the City's <br /> current affordable housing funding sources and investigate potential new <br /> affordable housing funding, which is the subject of this report. <br /> Since that time, the Finance Department and the Community Development Department <br /> have compiled information related to existing funding sources and suggested potential <br /> new sources. The Council Finance and Audit Committee also met to receive an update, <br /> and made recommendations related to potential funding sources and strategies for the <br /> production of affordable housing. The following report summarizes the cost of affordable <br /> housing production, current funding sources and how that money is spent, and <br /> recommends new potential funding sources. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Affordable Housing Production Costs <br /> Affordable housing is expensive to build and requires deep financial subsidies. <br /> Typically, affordable housing is more expensive to develop than market rate housing. <br /> This is because affordable housing development has higher expenses related to <br /> financing, construction and labor requirements. Furthermore, regulatory requirements <br /> significantly increase the costs of affordable housing development. These requirements <br /> can include federal, state and local procurement policies, lengthy funding and <br /> entitlement approval processes, local hiring preferences and prevailing wages. <br /> Affordable housing developers generally approach a project by first identifying the target <br /> tenant population and the target income category as defined by law (for example, "Low <br /> Income" and "Very Low Income" Senior Citizens). Secondly, the rent affordable to target <br /> demographic is determined and that is translated into an ongoing income stream based <br /> on the number of units in the development. In broad terms, the cost of constructing the <br /> housing is greater than the income stream from the housing, resulting in the <br /> "affordability gap". The estimated gap for various levels of income groups is shown in <br /> the table below along with an average affordability gap for each group. <br /> Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.