Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the whole <br /> of the record. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br /> Section 1. The recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are hereby <br /> incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth in their entirety. <br /> Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed Level of <br /> Review Authority Amendments are in the public interest and consistent with the Redwood <br /> City General Plan. <br /> Section 3. These proposed Level of Review Authority amendments have been <br /> reviewed with respect to applicability of the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") <br /> and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 <br /> et seq.). The project is exempt from CEQA as it can be seen with certainty that there is <br /> no impact on the environment. (See, e.g., CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b) (3).) Pursuant to <br /> Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other materials that constitute the record <br /> of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission has based its decision are located <br /> in and may be obtained from, the Office of the City Clerk at 1017 Middlefield Road, <br /> Redwood City, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before <br /> the City. <br /> Section 4. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council <br /> of the City of Redwood City adopt Amendments to Chapter 1, Article III of the Municipal <br /> Code by adding the text shown in underline (example) and deleting the text shown in <br /> strikeout (°x ), as provided in Exhibit A. Wording in brackets ([example]) is <br /> informational only and is not to be included in the published ordinance. <br /> Section 5. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council <br /> of the City of Redwood City adopt the proposed amendments that reorganize the <br /> administrative provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, ensuring consistency across permit <br /> types with state law, common practice and other permit requirements. Affected articles <br /> include Articles 1 (General Provisions), 2 (Definitions), 6 (R-2, (Residential — Duplex) <br /> District), 8 (R-3 (Multi-Family— Low Density) District), 22 (IS (Interim Study) District), 24 <br /> (PF (Public Facilities) District), 34 (Prezoning of Areas Prior to Annexation by the City), <br /> 37 (Accessory Dwelling Units), 39 (Child Care Facilities), 40 (Powers and Duties of <br /> Planning Bodies), 41 (Common Procedures), 42 (Use Permits), 43 (Variances), 44 <br /> (Reasonable Accommodations), 45 (Architectural Permits), 46 (Planned Development <br /> Permits), 47 (Planned Community Permits), 48 (Amendments), 51 (Interpretation, <br /> Repeals and Effective Date), 52 (Planned Community District or P District) adopting by <br /> adding the text shown in underline (example) and deleting the text shown in strikeout <br /> (cx""- ' plc), as provided in Exhibit B. Wording in brackets ([example]) is informational only <br /> and is not to be included in the published ordinance. <br /> ATTY/RESO.0094/PC RESO RECOMMENDING TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE&ZONING <br /> REV:10-13-16 VR <br /> Page 2 of 33 <br />