Laserfiche WebLink
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />nighttime visibility, it specifies that an EPAMD falls within SCA 13 (Alarcon). Local Government. Special <br />the definition of a "pedestrian" in the vehicle code, and Taxes & GO Bonds. Local Development. This bill autho- <br />authorizes local authorities to adopt ordinances with rizes a local government, with the approval of a ma_~ority of <br />respect to the time, place and manner of operation of its voters voting on the proposition, to impose a special tax <br />£PAMDs. We have two primary concerns with SB 1918, the to exclusively fund projects related to ~ransportation and <br />first being the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists and EPAMD other local development, as provided and to enacts a <br />users. SB 1918 poses a safety risk for all parties because it resolution with specified provisions. Authorizes a local <br />classifies an EPAMD (which can go up to 20 mph) as a government with the approval of a majority of its voters <br />pedestrian for the purposes of the vehicle code. This would voting on the proposition, to incur indebtedness in the <br />present safety issues for pedestrians who have to share a form of general obligation bonds to fund, the construction <br />limited space on the sidewalk with vehicles moving five of affordable housing for Iow and moderate income persons <br />times their speed. Whenever you have different transporta~ and projects that facilitate transportation between employ- <br />tion devices/methods/modes sharing a traveled way there is ment sites and affordable housing. Staff: Natasha Fooman/ <br />always an increased potential for the faster larger method Jean Flournoy Korinke, Status: SenNatRes&Wild, Position: <br />conflicting dangerously with the slower smaller method. Support. <br />This would also present safety concerns for bicyclists and <br />EPAMD users, The other issue we have is the liability of HOUSING AND LAND USE <br />cities. If we tell EPAMD users they can operate on a <br />sidewalk or within a bike lane, local governments could AB 787 (Hertzber§). Regional Planning. General <br />then be liable if something went wrong. While we com- Plans. AB 787 is a spot bill that states legislative intent <br />mend the author and sponsor for allowing local govern- concerning the conclusions of the Speaker's Commission on <br />ments to regulate where and when a Segway can be oper- Regionalism (Commission), and states the Legislature's <br />ated, until each.jurisdiction can pass an ordinance regular- intent to enact legislation reflecting the final recommenda- <br />lng Segways they could be held liable for any accidents that tions of the Commission. The final report of the Commis- <br />occurred. Finally, the problem with SB 1918 is it is trying sion was finished in Januaryand is available for review on <br />to address the impact of new technology without any the Commission's website. The direct link is: <br />history to judge what the impacts are. A new set of www.regionalism.org/pdf/ <br />regulations may have to be developed and adjusted as time scorfinalreportsummitO2febO2.pdf. Cities should continue <br />goes on and more experience is gained with these devices, to monitor this bill, as future amendments will be made <br />What might help is a sunset clause of three years, which based on the Commission's recommendations. Staff: Dan <br />would allow sufficient time for local.jurisdictions to work Carrigg, Status: SenLG, Position: Watch. <br />with the new device and discover what works best. Staff: <br />Natasha Fooman, Status: SenTrans, Hrg-4/25, Position: AB 2370 (Thomson). Local Agency Formation: <br />Oppose Unless Amended. Prohibitions on City Annexation. AB 2370 prohibits a <br /> local agency formation commission from approving or <br /> SCA 11 (Murray). Loans of Transportation Rev- conditionally approving a change of organization or <br />enues and Funds. SCA 11 requires any loan of motor reorganization or a change in a sphere of influence of a <br />vehicle fuel and vehicle-related revenues or trust funds not local government agency that would result in the annex- <br />repaid within the same fiscal year in which the loan was ation to a city or special district territory that is dedicated <br />made, or by a date not more than 30 days after the enact- or restricted to agricultural, open space, or conservation <br />merit of the budget bill for the subsequent fiscal year, be uses, if the city or special district provides or would provide <br />repaid with interest (at the rate paid on money in the facilities or services related to sewers, nonagricultural water, <br />Pooled Money Investment Account). It provides that a loan or streets and roads, unless the facilities or services benefit <br />of these funds may be made to other state funds or accounts land uses that are al lowed under the contract or easement <br />under the conditions applicable to loans to the General and the landowner consents to the change of organization <br />Fund. Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: SenTrans;Hrg-4/25, or reorganization. <br />Position: Review and Comment, <br /> <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 9 <br /> <br /> <br />