My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-05-06
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-05-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:52:46 PM
Creation date
5/3/2002 8:37:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/6/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Summary of discussion at the customer contact tracking meeting, 4/16/02 <br /> Categories of citizen contacts/complaints (along with short examples): <br /> <br /> 1) Citizen is upset with the treatment they received by an individual City staff person <br /> ("So-and-so was abusive to me!") <br /> 2) Citizen is upset with the treatment they received by a City department ("The <br /> Planning Department is all messed up, no one would help me") <br /> 3) Citizen has a complaint about City work that has been done ("The street/ <br /> sidewalk/tree/facilities work wasn't done right") <br /> 4) Citizen has a complaint about a City process or procedure (affordable housing, <br /> building permit process, etc. - could also include poJ~cies?) <br /> 5) Citizen requests service (fix a sewer overflow, etc.) <br /> 6) Citizen makes a suggestion on infrastructure improvement ("How about putting in <br /> more parking at...") <br /> 7) Citizen requests information or clarification on an issue ("what's the City's <br /> position on..." or "Who do I talk to to obtain a...") <br /> 8) Citizen requests help influencing some other agency (noise from jets at SFO) <br /> <br />In some cases a citizen makes complaint contact with a member of Council, about any <br />subject. This is not really a category of complaint, but rather is a mechanism by which <br />the complaint is made. In such a case the contact still needs to be categorized, and <br />flagged as 'Council' related (for reporting purposes). <br /> <br />For each complaint received, we need to find out the source, in other words, in what <br />form it came to us (letter, email, walk-in, phone call, paper wrapped around a brick and <br />thrown through a window) and to whom the complaint is specifically addressed, if <br />anyone <br /> <br />Tracking: <br />It was discussed that a common database might be set up into which all customer <br />complaints will be entered. All departments will have access to this database. When a <br />complaint comes in, to any department, the receiving staff member can query the <br />database to determine the history, if any, of the complaint and complainant - i.e., if it <br />has already been addressed to the relevant department, if it has since escalated, if it's a <br />recurring problem, etc. <br /> <br />The receiving staff person can then enter the new information, identify which <br />department is most appropriate to handle it (dependent on subject matter as well as <br />whether or not it's already been to the department level and is now escalating), and <br />forward the complaint and other relevant detail to that department via email. Perhaps an <br />individual in each department should be identified as the person to acknowledge such <br />referrals from other departments, and handle internal processing of the complaint. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.