My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1991-04-15
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
CC Min 1991-04-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:50:10 PM
Creation date
8/18/2004 3:09:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Date
4/15/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilwoman Buchan offered her preferences regarding the proposed <br />Recommendations noted above: <br /> <br />(1) Maybe per capita is not best system, but there are inequities in the <br />system. <br />(2) Current banking system works. 20% is not enough incentive. <br />(3) Agree that a building moratorium is not needed at this time. <br />(4) Supports increased charges; perhaps not enough staff to enforce <br />rationing. <br />(5) Public Use category is a good one. <br /> <br />Councilman Bury offered his preferences regarding the proposed <br />Recommendations noted above: <br /> <br />(1) <br />(2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />(5) <br /> <br />Per capita is harsh, but we need a formula people understand. <br />Banking is a good incentive and a good formula will be found. <br />No need for a building moratorium; balance is needed. <br />Supports increased charges to get overusers attention. <br />Public Use category is a good one. <br /> <br />Councilman Greenalch offered his preferences regarding the proposed <br />Recommendations noted above: <br /> <br />(1) <br />(2) <br />(3) <br />(4) <br />(5) <br />(6) <br /> <br />Further information regarding SFWD decisions will be forthcoming <br />Banking is acceptable, but needs to be closely monitored every month. <br />No need for a building moratorium at this time. <br />Supports increased charges, but need to cut water off when warranted. <br />Public Use category and Reserve are good and prudent moves. <br />Pursue inequities in current system including indoorloutdoor <br />differentials. <br /> <br />MIS: at 11:30 p.m., GreenalchlMurray to extend meeting for Mayor La Berge's <br />remarks. <br />Carried by unanimous voice vote. <br /> <br />MINUTE ORDER NO. 91-072 <br /> <br />Mayor La Berge offered her preferences regarding the proposed <br />Recommendations noted above. <br /> <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 50 <br />Page No. 231 <br /> <br />(1) Acknowledges support for present system, and not convinced that per <br />capita is best although it appears to be most equitable. <br />(2) Supports banking on a one to one basis and put money into education and <br />reclamation. <br />(3) No need for a building moratorium at this time. <br />(4) Excess Use fees need to be increased, overusers need water <br />restrictors. <br />(5) Public Use category is a good one, 100% for hospital~ is acceptable if <br />not used for irrigation purposes <br />(6) Agrees this subject should be referred back to Water Committee <br /> <br />Regular Meeting Minutes <br />April 15, 1991 <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.