My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-11-28 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-11-28 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 1:43:27 PM
Creation date
11/22/2016 12:36:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/28/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
432
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MayorJohnD.Seybert1017MIDDLEFIELDROAD <br />ViceMayorIanBainRedwoodCity,California94063 <br />Telephone(650)780Ͳ7220 <br />CouncilMembersFAX(650)261Ͳ9102 <br />AliciaC.Aguirrewww.redwoodcity.org <br />JanetBorgens <br />JeffreyGee <br />DianeHoward <br />ShellyMasur <br /> <br />July 26, 2016 <br />Honorable John L. Grandsaert, Grand Jury Judge <br />Southern Court <br />400 County Center, Department 11 <br />Redwood City, CA 94063-1655 <br />(Sent via email) <br />RE: Grand Jury Report “Body Worn Cameras – The Reel Truth.” <br />Dear Judge Grandsaert: <br />On behalf of the City Council of the City of Redwood City, I would like to thank you for the <br />opportunity to respond to the Grand Jury Report dated May 24, 2016, regarding police use of <br />body-worn cameras in San Mateo County. The following response to the Grand Jury Report <br />was reviewed and approved by the City Council at its meeting on July 25, 2016. <br />Pursuant to Penal Code Section 933.05, the Grand Jury requested responses from the City of <br />Redwood City on Recommendations 1 and 3. The Recommendations and the City’s response <br />are detailed as follows: <br />R1. The Grand Jury recommends that the councils of those cities/towns that have not <br />adopted body-worn cameras direct their respective chiefs of police to develop an <br />appropriate body-worn camera implementation plan and advise the public of their plan <br />by November 30, 2016. <br />Agree:A report on body-worn cameras will be prepared for City Council and public <br />review within the stipulated timeframe. <br />R3. The Grand Jury recommends that the police departments of those cities, towns, and <br />the Broadmoor Police Protection District that have not adopted body-worn cameras <br />implement a body-worn camera system as soon as possible but, in any case, no later <br />than October 31, 2017. <br />Partially Agree: The City agrees with the basic premise that body-worn cameras are an <br />important technological enhancement in the current era of modern policing. The City <br />recognizes the inherent benefits that body camera evidence provides for transparent <br />reviews of officer performance, the value of decreasing false claims against officers, <br />6.1.A. - Page 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.