Laserfiche WebLink
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # <br />DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# <br />CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial <br />Page 8 of 9 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 32 King Street <br /> <br />*Recorded by: Richard Brandi *Date: July 2016  Continuation  Update <br />DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information <br />The owners of the house were Marshall K. White and his wife Bertha who lived in the house from at least 1937 to 1965, according <br />to city directories. White was an escrow officer at the San Mateo County Title Company and during the 1950s was made Vice <br />President in the firm. At some point after 1965, he moved to Walnut Creek where he died on April 29, 1973, aged 82. A native of <br />Tennessee, he was a member of San Mateo Lodge F &A M (Masons), the Rossmoor Club, and a life member of the University of <br />California Association. <br /> <br />B 10. Significance <br />The building is located within the Mt. Carmel district, a potential historic district. It would appear to be a contributor to such a <br />district if one is established in the future. To be eligible for individual listing in California Register of Historical Resources a <br />resource must meet one of four criteria listed below; it must usually be more than 50 years old or sufficient time must have past to <br />determine its significance; it must have historic significance; and it must retain its physical integrity. Since the building was <br />constructed approximately 85 years ago, it meets the age requirement. <br /> <br />Criterion 1. The building does not appears to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources under criterion 1, <br />“Resources associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the <br />cultural heritage of California or the United States.” Although it is located in the Mr. Carmel district, this is not sufficient to <br />qualify under criterion 1. <br /> <br />Criterion 2. The building does not appear eligible for being associated with persons important to local, California or national <br />history.” Marshall K. White and his wife Bertha do not appear to be locally historic figures. <br /> <br />Criterion 3. the building appears to be eligible under criterion 3, “Resources that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, <br />period, region or method of construction.” The house is a good example of the cross gable roof subtype of Spanish Colonial <br />Revival style. The house features a large focal window, decorative vents, eves with little or no overhangs, red tile roofs, prominent <br />arches over window and doors and stucco walls. The windows are original. T herefore, it is eligible under the California Register <br />of Historical Resources under criterion 3. <br /> <br />Criterion 4. No analysis was made of the potential to yield information important in prehistory or history. <br /> <br />In addition to historical significance, a resource must retain its physical integrity, or the property’s ability to convey its historic <br />significance. Integrity consists of seven aspects: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and associatio n. The <br />house is in nearly original conditions, so all aspects of integrity are present. The house was modified when a side patio was <br />enclosed in 1967. This is not visible from the sidewalk and does not affect the integrity of design. The garage and house wer e <br />connected sometime between 1950 and 1967 according to Sanborn maps (it may have occurred in 1937 according to the Assessor) <br />but this did not alter the character-defining features of the house. The garage is set back far on the lot and it reads as a secondary or <br />ancillary building. A second story was added to the garage probably when the connection with the house was made but the garag e <br />itself was not moved. The house and garage are integral should be considered as one building. <br /> <br />An improvement may be designated a Redwood City historic landmark if it meets the following criteria: <br />Sec. 40.6. HISTORIC DESIGNATION CRITERIA <br />For the purposes of this Chapter, an improvement may be designated an historic landmark or historic site by the City Council, and <br />any area within the City may be designated an historic district by the City Council pursuant to Section 40.7 of this Chapter if it <br />meets the following criteria or other criteria established by the Planning Commission pursuant to Section 40.5 of this Chapter: <br /> <br /> A. It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the City’s cultural, aesthetic, or architectural history; or <br /> B. It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state or national history; or <br /> C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction; or it is a valuable example of <br />the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship; or <br /> D. It is representative of the notable work of a builder, designer, or architect. <br /> <br />Based on the discussion under the California Register, the house and its garage is eligible to be designated a Redwood City <br />landmark under criterion C because it embodies distinctive characteristics of the cross gable Spanish Colonial Revival style. <br /> <br />7.A. - Page 30