Laserfiche WebLink
6.3.A. - Page 121 <br />Responsibilityn <br />Bequireiri <br />Tasksin2013M <br />Persons/Groups <br />T melinert 0 <br />Responsible11 <br />CoC Governancetl <br />CcCsmusthavea writtenGovernanc Charter -that -meets HUD- <br />1. -Revise existing"CoC Guiding -Principles" to <br />Staff:-Wendyand <br />April—July-201311 a <br />addressnew-requirements; (draw-om <br />Katell <br />examples from other communities as- <br />• IdentifyHMI& Lead -Agency -and add r—hi is <br />needed)¶ <br />CoC Committee:-Ad- <br />rneeting-i requirements;ll <br />2. -Present -to -Steering -Committee -far- <br />Hoc working group -IF <br />• Include-BoardCode-of-Conduct;¶ <br />adoption/approvabt <br />• Describe -how -Board is -selected; -how -required <br />Wpsergons-assure{ <br />Project- <br />Define performance standards: for, -and-i projects:¶ <br />1— Convene -Project Performance- <br />Staff.. -Wendy, <br />April —Se{rtember2013tt 11 <br />Perforrnance7l <br />Establish -system -for -gathering data -and -assessing- <br />subcommittee;¶ <br />gam,-Lindaand- <br />perFormance-far-CcC-and-€SG-projects:¶ <br />2-- Draft-pefformanr standards-to-pmsentto- <br />Katell <br />• Establish -system -for -helping under -achieving -projects <br />the full 'V,&-Com.mrttee;ll <br />improve (eg, through -TA) 11 <br />3.- P'rapose-sirstem for -evaluation of -projects., <br />QC Committee:-- <br />• incorporate performance data-into-decisionsaboutproject. <br />options-for-performance-improvemem/FA <br />Project-Perrormance- <br />ranking-and re -a l locatiorut <br />(e -g: "scorecards; performance <br />Subcommittee11 <br />improvement -plans, etc-)¶ <br />4—implement-performances aluation-before- <br />2013 appl ication process i <br />System -Planning <br />CoCis responsible -for -1 <br />1.-Convene-System-PlanningSubcommittee;11 <br />Staff: -Wendy, <br />April—September {first 11 <br />and -System- <br />Analyzing systeen performameanddeveloping-strategies <br />2.- Develop recommendations -for €oordirated <br />f�-Lindaand- <br />steps -for -Coordinated <br />Performarice11 <br />for-improvement-(e.g: reduce -total length -of -time -people- <br />assessment and-referral-system11 <br />Katell <br />EntryA <br />are homeless; reduce overall num ho i-, people)TI <br />• Designingasystem-of services -shelter -and -housing,- <br />CoC Committee:-- <br />¶ <br />including -[l) coordinated access,- assessment and referral; <br />System Planning <br />(2)-ime"emions-m-rapidly-re-house homeless people; -(3)- <br />Subcommittee11 <br />Ongoing forother-work11 <br />employment options, -(4) -participation in -mainstream - <br />benefits -programs; (5)-reducedisdra rge-imohomeiessness- <br />from -mai nstream-systems; ¶ <br />• Developing -written -policies and -standards for-C-and-ESG- <br />assistance (e,g. who areceives-what-type-andievel-of- <br />a5sista nre--for-how lon,�itt <br />Hi <br />CoC-is-respor4le&rlmplementirig -and maintaining -a nHMIS- <br />1 --Implement changes -m needed to- meet -new - <br />Staff: -Caw rine David,- <br />April—December-2913- IF <br />system -that -meets HUD -requirememm <br />HMIS data -standard¶ <br />Katell <br />(and ongoingj11 <br />2.—Focus on improvements in-Data'CWality11 <br />CeCCommittee:- <br />HOPE Users-Gmup11 <br />CoGApplication11 <br />CcC is -responsible -for -preparing annual application for gg& <br />1.-Convene-NOFA Planning Group/Review- <br />Staff. -Wendy <br />Summer/Fall-201311 tt <br />funding providing input -and -consultation on-ESG fundingri <br />Panel -at -time -of NOFA release -to make- <br />Katell <br />recon mendationsnegarding-Ieca I -process -rt <br />QC Committee:-- <br />NOFA <br />Committee/Review- <br />PanelN <br />I <br />Consolidated Plan REDWOOD CITY 118 <br />OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) <br />