My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1967 Jan to Dec
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1967
>
1967 Jan to Dec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 2:54:19 PM
Creation date
12/16/2016 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1967
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
had occured several years ago from a similar situation and that Staff had made a <br />recommendation which should be heeded. City Attorney agreed that instance referred <br />to, had resulted from allowing a bidder to make a change after submitting a bid <br />and that several law suits were filed. <br />Attorney, representing W. H. Ebert Corp. -Spartan Construction <br />Company, second lowest bidder, stated his clients had met all of <br />the requirements and would suggest, that although sympathetic <br />to facts presented by the lowest bidder, to allow bidders to <br />submit bonds after opening of bids would shake the confidence <br />of the bidders in the City and urged Council award bid to his clients. <br />City Manager stated he felt Staff recommendation well covered and supported by <br />the City Attorney, and that to award other than as recommended would result in <br />City's loss of respect in the contracting community. City Manager quoted from <br />recommendation made by Jenks & Adamson containing this exact phrasing that it <br />was their belief "to accept this proposal would establish bad precedent and loss <br />of respect in the contracting community," and recommended that bid be awarded <br />to the second low bidder, W. H. Ebert Corp. -Spartan Construction Co., an experi- <br />enced and competent underground contractor. <br />Mr. Evans again urged Council consider waiving of proce- <br />dural error and award contract to his clients, Mission <br />Pipeline Co. <br />After further discussion and questioning by Council members, Councilman Keckley <br />recommended that award to lowest bidder should be considered since it was possi- <br />ble to waive a procedural irregularity and take the cheaper bid, and doubt <br />expressed by Councilman Granger as to appropriate action. Motion carried on roll <br />call vote, Councilman Bury, Henderson, Rosselli and Mayor Herkner voting yes, <br />Councilman Granger abstaining, Councilman Keckley voting no, Councilman Petersen <br />being noted absent. <br />Report of Legislative Committee continued at request of Councilman Rosselli, Chairman, <br />for one week. (Memo 4/11/67) <br />Councilman Keckley moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5340 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXE- <br />CUTION OF MODIFIED AGREEMENT FOR THE DEDICATION OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF WAY AND THE <br />IMPROVEMENT OF CERTAIN RIGHTS OF WAY IN THE VICINITY OF MAIN STREET AND VETERANS <br />BOULEVARD, seconded by Councilman Granger. <br />Staff report stated approval had been given by Council for improvements to be <br />made at this location, and request now being made by Standard Oil Co. for modi- <br />fication of agreement as to effective date of completion from December 31, 1967 <br />to June 30. 1968, becausg6onies would not be available in their budget until end <br />of their fiscal year, and further amended to permit Standard Oil to continue use _ <br />of their facilities until Main Street is improved in accordance with this agreement <br />including a "hold harmless" clause in favor of the City. A slide was shown illus- <br />trating the site and improvements proposed explained. <br />Councilman Henderson questioned whether a traffic hazard would be created and was _ <br />advised by Director of Public Works of improvements to be made at this intersec- <br />tion with development of Motor City but that intersection would be used as it now <br />is until improvements made and Standard Oil Station rebuilt, but that no traffic <br />hazard would exist. <br />APR 10 '67 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.