1967 Jan to Dec - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

It was also stated studies by the Committee indicated that the per employee base was gaining wide acceptance because of its ease of application and administration. He stated information regarding the number and types of businesses and number of employees was obtained by mailing some 1500 return post cards to all licensed business establishments within the City limits, with a 60% return of replies. Councilman Bury stated again it had not been the intent of the Committee to achieve increased revenues, but rather equitability. Revenues for 1965-66 were estimated to have been $65,000 and only a modest increase was anticipated under this new proposed ordinance, (entered in new 1967-68 budget as $68,000) most of which would be due to levying a tax against businesses which had previously escaped under the pro- visions of the present ordinance. Councilman Bury stated it was the Committee's recommendation that the proposed Business License Tax Ordinance be introduced and adopted by Council in order that it could be made effective the first of the fiscal year, without intention of Committee to preclude possibility of future amendments, should it appear desirable. Councilman Bury commented on outstanding service performed by Mr. Bernard E. Nelson, Vice -President of Municipal License Tax Association, an association supported by business interests, working with the Committee. His experience, having worked with a wide variety of business tax ordinances throughout the State, was invaluable to the Committee. Mr. Nelson, of Municipal License Tax Association, outlined his Association's purposes, similar to a Chamber of Commerce, a none -profit organization supported by business membership and dues. They had recognized need for development of this particular type of ordinance throughout the State where under consideration by various cities, to seek the most equitable for all concerned. He stated no ordinance could rightly be considered 100% equitable and suggested hope that business concerns would take the opportunity to offer construc- tive criticism for review. Councilman Granger entered the meeting at 8:00 P. M. Mr. Don Johnson, 506 Sequoia Avenue, (Charles -Don Tires, Inc., 1475 Veterans Blvd.) expressed his concern about cost of administration of such a business license tax ordinance. Mayor Herkner asked Staff to reply. City Clerk stated she was not able to give the exact cost of administration, but reported one employee working on business li- censes 80% of his time, with remaining 20% on other duties in the Collector's Dept. She stated only other costs would be nominal costs for printing of forms and mailing licenses. Mr. Johnson quoted a communication in 1964 by the Chamber of Commerce after a study made of business tax, in which they had recommended repeal of such a license tax ordinance and such revenue be raised by increasing the property tax. Mr. Johnson stated Mr. Jack Stuart was Chairman in 1964 of the Chamber Study Committee. He read Mr. Stuart's communi- cation dated April 5, 1967, declining to serve asa:member of the Study Committee and challenging the legality of the ordinance. Charles Sellers, owner of a one man operation barber shop at 2347 E1 Camino Real, urged Council to not enact such a tax proposal. 75 MV 22 'Bi