Laserfiche WebLink
k0/j <br />Henderson asked for further clarification concerning funds, and indicated her <br />opposition to proposed Ordinance. Councilman Rosselli requested roll call vote. <br />Motion carried on roll call vote, Councilman Henderson voting no. <br />Councilman Petersen moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5255 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING <br />EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND CITY OF <br />REDWOOD CITY RELATIVE TO ASSESSING AND COLLECTING OF TAXES AND TAX ASSESSMENTS, <br />seconded by Councilman Granger. <br />Councilman Henderson stated her opposition to this proposed action for Council <br />which also serves as Board of Directors to this District, to sit as Board of <br />Equalization. Councilman Bury expressed concern for best interests of City, <br />but felt this proposal most logical position of control for Council and in best <br />interest of City. Councilman Rosselli reminded Council of fact that before tax- <br />ing and assessing turned over to County that Council did sit as Boa rd of <br />Equalization and considered all assessments made throughout the entire City. <br />Councilman Granger questioned City Attorney as to provisions in the City's <br />Charter concerning Council acting as Board of Equalization. City Attorney <br />advised this procedure no different than Council handling of other assessment <br />districts, such as one at this meeting for Lexington Avenue Improvement <br />District, other than collection and redemption features are to be handled <br />by the County. Motion carried on roll call vote, Councilman Henderson voting no. <br />Councilman Keckley moved to introduce Ordinance establishing independent <br />assessment and equalization procedure for General Improvement District No. 1-64 <br />seconded by Councilman Rosselli. On question Councilman Henderson asked why <br />ordinance must be introduced tonight and adoption by next week and what effect <br />should this procedure not be taken. <br />City Attorney advised he had recommended this action to make certain there would <br />be no problem caused by the effective date, but had not researched eventually <br />if scheduled changed. <br />Bury (corrected by minutes of February 6, 1967) <br />Councilman Henderson questioned assessment theory and was advised by City <br />Attorney, based on fair market value appraisal rather than benefit received <br />approach. <br />Mr. Kubelbeck, of DMJM, further clarified theory for <br />assessing on fair market value as a criterion of fair <br />distribution of taxing and assessing which is in essence <br />a benefit theory. <br />Councilman Henderson indicated her opposition to this proposed ordinance. Mayor <br />Herkner requested roll call vote. Motion carried on roll call vote, Councilman <br />Henderson voting no. <br />Councilman Petersen moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5256 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING <br />EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR EXPERT PERSONAL APPRAISAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH <br />TAX ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FOR GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-64, seconded by <br />Councilman Bury. <br />