My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 1:00:25 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 12:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
12/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4.3.2 Environmental Checklist <br />4.3.3 <br />\1' •l f\/IMII.1 <br />Section 4.0 — Environmental Setting and Discussion of Impacts <br />Less Than <br />Potmlially Significant Less Than Beneficial infonnation <br />significant with Significant No Impact Impact Source(s) <br />Impact Mitigation Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Would the project; <br />1) <br />Conflict with or obstruct <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1,7 <br />implementation of the applicable air <br />quality plan? <br />2) <br />Violate any air quality standard or <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1,7 <br />contribute substantially to an <br />existing or projected air quality <br />violation? <br />3) <br />Result in a cumulatively <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1,7 <br />considerable net increase of any <br />criteria pollutant for which the <br />project region is classified as non - <br />attainment under an applicable <br />federal or state ambient air quality <br />standard including releasing <br />emissions which exceed <br />quantitative thresholds for ozone <br />precursors? <br />4) <br />Expose sensitive receptors to <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1,7 <br />substantial pollutant concentrations? <br />5) <br />Create objectionable odors affecting <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />1 <br />a substantial number of people? <br />Air Quality Impacts <br />Aspreviously discussed at the beginning of Section 4. 0, on December 17, 2015, the California <br />Supreme Court issued an opinion in "CBJA vs. BAAQMD" holding that CEQA, with several specific <br />exceptions, is primarily concerned with the impacts of a project on the environment and generally <br />does not require agencies to analyze the impact of existing conditions on a project's fitture users or <br />residents unless the project risks exacerbating those environmental hazards or risks that already <br />exist. One exception relates to school projects. CEQA requires agencies to evaluate a project site's <br />environmental conditions to determine f school sites are located in close proximity to freeways or <br />other operations that might emit hazardous air emissions. <br />City of Redwood City 22 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.