Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper

Browse Search

Section 4.0 — Emrironmental Setting and Discussion of Impacts 4.4.1.3 Conservation Plans The project site is not within an area covered by a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). 4.4.2 Environmental Checklist BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 2) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 3) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 4) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? City of Redwood City S andpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 1,7 ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 1 30 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2016 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Beneficial Information Significant With Significant No Impact UnpacC Source(s) Unpact Mitigation Impact Incorporated ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 1,7 ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 1 30 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration November 2016