My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 1:00:25 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 12:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
12/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.0— Environmental Setting and Discussion oflnrpacts <br />4.11 MINERAL RESOURCES <br />4.11.1 Existing Setting <br />The project site is located in the City of Redwood City. The project site and surrounding area are <br />developed with urban land uses. There are no known mineral resources located on or adjacent to the <br />project site. <br />4.11.2 Environmental Checklist <br />MINERAL RESOURCES <br />Would the project: <br />1) Result in the loss of availability of a <br />known mineral resource that would <br />be of value to the region and the <br />residents of the state? <br />2) Result in the loss of availability of a <br />locally -important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a local <br />general plan, specific plan or other <br />land use plan? <br />4.11.3 Mineral Resources Impacts <br />Less Than <br />Potentially Significant Less Than Beneficial Information <br />Significant With Significant No Impact pact Source(s) <br />Impact Mitigation Impact <br />Incorporated <br />❑ ❑ ❑ M ❑ 1 <br />❑ ❑ ❑ M ❑ 1 <br />4.11.3.1 Impacts to Mineral Resources (Checklist Questions I and 2) <br />The project site and the surrounding area are completely developed with urban uses. The project site <br />is not a known location of a mineral resource. For these reasons, the proposed project would not <br />result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or a mineral resource recovery site. (No <br />Impact) <br />4.11.4 Conclusion <br />The proposed project would not impact known mineral resources, (No Impact) <br />City of Redwood City 70 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.