My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 7:40:57 AM
Creation date
1/5/2017 6:17:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/9/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.D. - Page 18 <br />Equalization for the collection of our UUT on prepaid wireless services. We began collecting revenue on prepaid <br />wireless in January 2016 and will continue until AB 1717 sunsets in 2020. This revenue source amounted to <br />$67,600 for FY 2015-16. While traditional UUT revenue has been dedicated on an annual basis to support the <br />City's capital improvement program, the City has committed this new source of UUT revenue to affordable <br />housing. <br />Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund Refunds <br />In FY 1992-93 and FY 1993-94, the State shifted property taxes from cities, counties, and special districts to <br />school districts to supplant funding that the State was providing to school districts. The funds shifted from these <br />local governments are placed into the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) by the County Controller. <br />The Controller then disburses these funds to school districts based upon the formula prescribed by State law. <br />Any funds remaining in ERAF (after the distribution to the school districts) are returned to the cities, county, and <br />special districts in proportion to the amount they contributed to ERAF. This return of property tax revenue is <br />difficult to anticipate due to complicated State school funding formulas and at risk of reduction or elimination by <br />State action. In FYs 2014-15 and 2015-16, the City received $5.1 million and $4.8 million annually respectively. <br />This level of funding was higher than can be expected in the future due to various one-time factors and recent <br />and potential changes in school financing, which the County Controller has indicated could significantly reduce <br />this revenue source in FY 2015-16 and future years. The City's policy is to budget what reasonably can be <br />estimated, which is approximately $2.5 million or about 52%. Any additional funds will be committed to one time <br />uses and to reduce long term liabilities, per City Council direction. <br />In Lieu Sales Tax Triple Flip <br />The "Triple Flip" was part of the State's 2004 budget in which sales and use taxes that previously went to cities <br />and counties were diverted to the State to be used to repay the State's Economic Recovery Bonds. The Economic <br />Recovery Bonds were defeased in July 2015 and the final "Triple Flip" payment was received in August 2016. <br />Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency <br />As Successor Agency, the City continues the focus on the disposition of the $10.3 million in funds that had been in <br />the former Redevelopment Agency's possession and which were encumbered for below-market housing through <br />an agreement with the Legal Aid Society. The control of these funds has been in dispute with the State of <br />California Department of Finance (DOF) since the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved in FY 2011-12. The City <br />filed suit against the State challenging the DOF's position that these funds are unencumbered and must be <br />remitted to the County Controller. Although the State prevailed in the Superior Court trial the City's legal team <br />does not agree with the Court's decision and has filed an appeal. The appeal is fully briefed and the City is <br />awaiting a court date. <br />In the meantime, new State legislation (SB107) was passed in September 2015 requiring that all obligations <br />determined by the DOF be paid in order for successor agencies to receive the benefits of a finding of completion. <br />The City remitted the funds prior to the end of calendar year 2015 for distribution to the taxing entities while it <br />continues to pursue its appeal. The City advised the taxing entities to hold the funds in case the City prevails in <br />this appeal. <br />The City also continues to work with the State of California regarding the disposition of several former <br />Redevelopment Agency land parcels. <br />Relevant Financial Policies <br />In April 1999 the City Council adopted a policy targeting the unreserved portion of the general fund's fund balance <br />designated for subsequent year's expenditures to fall within a range from 15% to 20% of anticipated general fund <br />revenues. As a result of implementing GASB 54 these amounts are now reported under the category "Unassigned <br />v <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.