My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 7:40:57 AM
Creation date
1/5/2017 6:17:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/9/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TA. - Page 53 <br />Determination: <br />On the basis of this initial evaluation: <br />❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE <br />DECLARATION will be prepared. <br />❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a <br />significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. <br />A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br />❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL <br />IMPACT REPORT is required. <br />❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" <br />impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to <br />applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described <br />on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that <br />remain to be addressed. <br />FX I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially <br />significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to <br />applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated to the extent feasible pursuant to that earlier EIR or <br />NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions, mitigation measures, and uniformly applied development policies <br />that are imposed upon the project, nothing further is required. The proposed project would not result in any new or <br />substantially more severe significant environmental effects than those analyzed in the earlier CEQA document. The <br />previously certified Downtown Precise Plan program EIR adequately describes the proposed project for the purposes of <br />CEQA. The proposed project is also consistent with the Downtown Precise Plan. <br />May 11, 2016 <br />Signature Date <br />Seth Adams May 11, 2016 <br />Printed Name Date <br />C:7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.