Laserfiche WebLink
�.A- I� <br /> Legislative Bill Action <br /> ............................................................... <br /> make joint-use laws more flexible for local agen- streamlined their parking, setbacks, and other <br /> standards. Typical of many bills, SB 1818 ap- <br /> cies. Staff: Dan Carrigg; Status: Gov; Position: w <br /> Request For Signature. proaches this issue in a one-size-fits-all fashion." <br /> Staff: Dan Carrigg; Status: Gov; Position: <br /> AB 2581 (Lieber) Mobilehome Parks: Con- Request for VETO. (See the League's online <br /> version. AB 2581 clarifies that if a mobilehome Advocacy Center at www.cacities.orq/ <br /> park is closed by a code enforcement agency advocacvicenter to access a sample letter to <br /> through a suspension of the permit to operate, <br /> the governor.) <br /> then the park owner is responsible for preparing SB 1056 (Alarcon) Development Projects: <br /> the required park conversion report. This mea- Superstore Retailers. SB 1056 undermines <br /> sure ensures that resident relocation and other �ocal land use authority by requiring a city or <br /> concerns will be appropriately considered if a park county, prior to approving or disapproving a <br /> must be closed due to code enforcement actions. ��superstore retailer", to require a specified eco- <br /> Staff: Dan Carrigg; Status: Gov; Position: nomic impact report be prepared by a public or <br /> Request For Signature. <br /> private entity that is professionally qualified in <br /> AB 2702 (Steinberg) Housing: Second economic analysis. •SB 1056 is oriented toward <br /> Units. AB 2702 limits local ability to regulate the halting the development of large retail centers due <br /> development of second housing units and prohibit to concerns about their impact on existing retail <br /> absentee-landlord duplexes within single family 9rocery chains and union jobs. Like many other <br /> zones. It would also mandate specific housing land uses, the approval of these large stores can <br /> densities for school sites, usurping local zoning be controversial. The analysis proposed in this bill, <br /> authority and undermining planning principles however, is not neutral on this issue, and will only <br /> relating to traffic, site conditions and other local fuel controversy and promote litigation. Each city <br /> considerations. These important land use deci- may reach different conclusions on the extent to <br /> sions should be left to local governments and Which these enterprises add to or extract value <br /> residents who can best determine the impacts the from their communities. In either case, this <br /> decision should be theirs, not the State <br /> decisions will have on a community. Staff: Dan Legislature's, to make. Staff: Dan Carrigg; <br /> Carrigg; Status: Gov; Position: Request for Status: Gov; Position: Request for VETO. <br /> VETO. (See the League's online Advocacy <br /> Center at www.cacities.orq/advocacvicenter to AB 3065 (Kehoe) General Plan: Safety <br /> access a sample letter to the governor, and a Element. AB 3065 requires approximately 50 <br /> sample letter to send to the editor of your cities within the state with designated very high <br /> local print and electronic media.) fire hazard severity zones to submit their safety <br /> SB 1818 (Hollingsworth) Density Bonuses. elements for review and comment by the State <br /> This legislation makes a number of changes to Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and any <br /> state Density Bonus Law, which not only reflect local agency that provides fire protection services <br /> flawed policy, but also would impose additional to the affected area. Although the League sup- <br /> unfunded state mandate costs on local govern- Ports improving communication between state <br /> ments. SB 1818 cuts in half the amount of afford- and local agencies on fire prevention and protec- <br /> able housing that developers must build under the tion strategies, our fire and safety officials believe <br /> law, while significantly increasing the concessions that there are more efficient, less cumbersome <br /> and density bonuses that must be provided. The and less costly ways of exchanging information <br /> bill fails to recognize that many communities than the expansion of the old "command and <br /> already have affordable housing plans in place, control" model where state staff are hired to await <br /> have aggressively zoned for high-density and have the submission of local plans. For instance, the <br /> September 3, 2004 -- www.cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 7 <br />