My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-09-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-09-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:00:31 PM
Creation date
9/9/2004 1:08:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/13/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
` �'� <br /> Under thc No Action altemative, thc Retuge would discontinuc on-going levec <br /> maintcnance and would not repair any Icvec breaks. The Rcfuge would work N�ith thc <br /> San Carlos Airport and the SBSA to protect tl�eir infrastructure on Inner Bair lsland. <br /> The existing levees on Middle and Outer Bair Island would eventually breach causing <br /> unmanaged tidal inundation of the ponds. This would result in several impacts to existing <br /> infrastructure. There would be an increase in the sedimentation rate of the Redwood <br /> Creek Shipping Channel resulting in the need for more frequent dredging by ihe Port of <br /> Redwood City. At least in the short-term, there would be an increase in the velocity rate <br /> of the tidal waters at the junction of Smith Slough and Redwood Creek making use of the <br /> Pete's Harbor Marina more difficult Ponding of water on Inner Bair Island would <br /> increase the bird strike issue for the San Cazlos Airport. Approximately 1,400 acres of <br /> tidal salt marsh would eventually be restored but the No Action Alternative would delay <br /> restoration of the ponds to salt marsh by 20-100 years and, at least in ihe short term, result <br /> in poorer quality endangered species habitat being developed compared to the four action <br /> alternatives. <br /> In the short-term (approximatel}� five years), the No Action altemative would provide <br /> limited public use consistent with protection of wildlife habitat and public safety. In the <br /> long term (approximately five to ten years), as the Inner Bair Island levee became unsafe, <br /> public use of the 3-mile trail would be eliminated and the area would be closed to public <br /> access. No additional public use infrastructure such as wildlife viewin� platforms and <br /> interpretive signage would be installed and the Bair Island parking lot would be closed. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.