My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-01-23 Closed and Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-01-23 Closed and Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 10:22:46 AM
Creation date
1/19/2017 3:58:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/23/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
645
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.0 – Environmental Setting and Discussion of Impacts <br /> <br /> <br />City of Redwood City 22 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />4.3.2 Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />AIR QUALITY <br /> Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No Impact Beneficial <br />Impact <br />Information <br />Source(s) <br />Would the project: <br />1) Conflict with or obstruct <br />implementation of the applicable air <br />quality plan? <br /> 1,7 <br />2) Violate any air quality standard or <br />contribute substantially to an <br />existing or projected air quality <br />violation? <br /> 1,7 <br /> 3) Result in a cumulatively <br />considerable net increase of any <br />criteria pollutant for which the <br />project region is classified as non- <br />attainment under an applicable <br />federal or state ambient air quality <br />standard including releasing <br />emissions which exceed <br />quantitative thresholds for ozone <br />precursors? <br /> 1,7 <br />4) Expose sensitive receptors to <br />substantial pollutant concentrations? <br /> 1,7 <br />5) Create objectionable odors affecting <br />a substantial number of people? <br /> 1 <br /> <br /> <br />4.3.3 Air Quality Impacts <br /> <br />As previously discussed at the beginning of Section 4.0, on December 17, 2015, the California <br />Supreme Court issued an opinion in “CBIA vs. BAAQMD” holding that CEQA, with several specific <br />exceptions, is primarily concerned with the impacts of a project on the environment and generally <br />does not require agencies to analyze the impact of existing conditions on a project’s future users or <br />residents unless the project risks exacerbating those environmental hazards or risks that already <br />exist. One exception relates to school projects. CEQA requires agencies to evaluate a project site‘s <br />environmental conditions to determine if school sites are located in close proximity to freeways or <br />other operations that might emit hazardous air emissions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7.A. - Page 53
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.