My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-01-23 Closed and Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-01-23 Closed and Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 10:22:46 AM
Creation date
1/19/2017 3:58:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/23/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
645
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.0 – Environmental Setting and Discussion of Impacts <br /> <br /> <br />City of Redwood City 70 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />4.11 MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />4.11.1 Existing Setting <br /> <br />The project site is located in the City of Redwood City. The project site and surrounding area are <br />developed with urban land uses. There are no known mineral resources located on or adjacent to the <br />project site. <br /> <br />4.11.2 Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> <br />MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No Impact Beneficial <br />Impact <br />Information <br />Source(s) <br />Would the project: <br />1) Result in the loss of availability of a <br />known mineral resource that would <br />be of value to the region and the <br />residents of the state? <br /> 1 <br />2) Result in the loss of availability of a <br />locally-important mineral resource <br />recovery site delineated on a local <br />general plan, specific plan or other <br />land use plan? <br /> 1 <br /> <br /> <br />4.11.3 Mineral Resources Impacts <br /> <br />4.11.3.1 Impacts to Mineral Resources (Checklist Questions 1 and 2) <br /> <br />The project site and the surrounding area are completely developed with urban uses. The project site <br />is not a known location of a mineral resource. For these reasons, the proposed project would not <br />result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or a mineral resource recovery site. (No <br />Impact) <br /> <br />4.11.4 Conclusion <br /> <br />The proposed project would not impact known mineral resources. (No Impact) <br /> <br />7.A. - Page 101
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.