Laserfiche WebLink
-32- <br />control, accountability or other purposes. Revenues are fully accrued to include unbilled <br />services at fiscal year end. <br /> <br />The City uses the accrual basis of accounting for its “proprietary funds,” including the <br />City’s water enterprise fund. Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are <br />recognized when the related liabilities are incurred. All assets and liabilities for these funds are <br />included on the balance sheet with this measurement focus. Fund equity (i.e., net total assets) is <br />segregated into restricted, unrestricted and net investment in capital assets. <br /> <br />See APPENDIX B—COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE CITY <br />FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 for a more complete summary of the City’s <br />accounting policies. <br /> <br />Outstanding Enterprise Obligations <br /> <br />Following issuance of the Bonds and the redemption of the 2007 Bonds, the obligations <br />of the City secured by Net Revenues will be the 2017 Installment Purchase Contract, the 2015 <br />Installment Purchase Contract and the 2013 Installment Purchase Contract. <br /> <br />Capitalization Policy <br /> <br />Generally, capital assets are major assets that have initial useful lives extending beyond <br />a single reporting fiscal period. The cost criterion used to determine whether a given asset <br />should be capitalized and included in the balance sheet is known as the “capitalization <br />threshold.” If the cost of the asset equals or exceeds this threshold, then that amount is included <br />in the balance sheet, or capitalized. The City's current threshold for each individual general <br />capital asset is $5,000 for equipment with an initial useful life of 2 years or greater and $100,000 <br />for all other general capital assets with an initial useful life of 20 years or greater. The threshold <br />for infrastructure is $100,000 for assets with a useful life of 20 years or greater. <br /> <br />Costs are capitalized only if they are directly identifiable with a specific asset. Thus, the <br />cost of a study undertaken to determine water system improvements for a specific area would <br />not be capitalized. Neither would the cost of training employees on new capital assets. <br />Improvements to capital assets that provide additional value, such as lengthening a capital <br />asset's estimated useful life, or increasing a capital asset's ability to provide service, such as <br />greater effectiveness or efficiency or increasing water pumping capacity, would be capitalized, <br />but only if the cost of the improvement met or exceeded the capitalization threshold. Repairs <br />and maintenance costs, which are costs incurred to retain the value of a capital asset, rather than <br />provide additional value, are not capitalized. Repairs and maintenance costs are generally <br />recognized as those expenses necessary to keep an asset in its intended operational condition <br />and which do not materially provide additional value to the asset. <br /> <br />The City accounts for annual water enterprise expenses in the separate funds into which <br />expenses were appropriated, which include a bond-funded projects fund, a capital project fund <br />(funded from operations) and an operating fund. Capital additions and replacements are <br />appropriated to the capital project fund, as are certain other expenses not strictly necessary for <br />the operation of the enterprise. Capital expenses in each fund that do not meet the capitalization <br />threshold, as well as all water conservation program expenses, capital planning expenses and <br />meter replacement expenses, are treated as operating expenses and are shown as maintenance <br />and operating expenses in the City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (“CAFR”). <br /> <br />It had been the City’s policy to subtract discretionary non-capitalized capital fund <br />expenses, along with depreciation and amortization, from its CAFR-reported maintenance and <br />operating expenses when calculating the debt service coverage ratio of the water enterprise <br />8.C. - Page 57