Laserfiche WebLink
-46- <br />materials furnished to it and on investigations, studies and assumptions of its own. There is no <br />assurance such ratings will continue for any given period of time or that such ratings will not be <br />revised downward or withdrawn entirely by Moody’s and/or S&P, if in the judgment of <br />Moody’s and/or S&P, circumstances so warrant. Any such downward revision or withdrawal <br />of such ratings may have an adverse effect on the market price for the Bonds. <br /> <br /> <br />CONTINUING DISCLOSURE <br /> <br />The City has covenanted for the benefit of Bond Owners and beneficial owners of the <br />Bonds to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the Enterprise by <br />not later than nine months following the end of the City’s fiscal year (currently ending June 30) <br />(the “Annual Report”), commencing with the report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, and <br />to provide notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events. The Annual Report and the <br />notices of material events will be filed by the City with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking <br />Board (the “MSRB”) through the Electronic Municipal Access (EMMA) System. The specific <br />nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report or the notices of material events <br />is summarized below under the caption APPENDIX D—FORM OF CONTINUING <br />DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE. These covenants have been made in order to assist the <br />Underwriter in complying with S.E.C. Rule 15c2-12(b)(5). The City has not failed to comply in <br />all material respects with any undertaking under the Rule in the past five years, except as <br />follows: (i) with respect to three issues of water revenue bonds, the City sent its annual reports <br />and financial information for its 2010 filing to its dissemination agent, but the dissemination <br />agent failed to file the report and financial information with EMMA; (ii) with respect to water <br />revenue bonds issued in 2006 and 2007, the City’s dissemination agent omitted from its fiscal <br />year 2014 filing the City’s operating data reports; (iii) the City’s required financial information <br />was filed late for the Redwood Shore Community Facilities District No. 99-1 Special Tax <br />Refunding Bonds, Series 2012B (although it was filed timely for all other City bond issues); and <br />(iv) various notices of rating changes for several City bond issues, constituting material events, <br />were not timely filed. All required filings have now been made and the City is presently current <br />with all of its continuing disclosure undertakings due during the past five years. [TO BE <br />CONFIRMED] <br /> <br /> <br />TAX MATTERS <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, <br />Bond Counsel, subject, however to the qualifications set forth below, under existing law, the <br />interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and such <br />interest is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax <br />imposed on individuals and corporations, provided, however, that, for the purpose of <br />computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on corporations (as defined for federal income <br />tax purposes), such interest is taken into account in determining certain income and earnings. <br /> <br />The opinions set forth in the preceding paragraph are subject to the condition that the <br />Authority and the City comply with all requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as <br />amended (the "Tax Code") that must be satisfied subsequent to the issuance of the Bonds. The <br />Authority and the City have covenanted to comply with each such requirement. Failure to <br />comply with certain of such requirements may cause the inclusion of such interest in gross <br />income for federal income tax purposes to be retroactive to the date of issuance of the Bonds. <br /> <br />8.C. - Page 71