Laserfiche WebLink
Audubon Society stepped to the podium. Vice Mayor Claire asked if the problem on the <br />levee was with people, dogs, predators or a combination of all. Ms. Smith stated her <br />understanding is that the levee must be closed off for the predator management group to <br />perform the live trapping of the introduced species and the species they prey on being the <br />Clapper Rail, mouse and other ground nesting birds in the area. Discussion between Ms. <br />Smith and Vice Mayor Claire continued regarding trapping times needed as it relates to <br />closing of the levees. <br />Council Member Jordan stated that while she does not want to put up gates, she does <br />support doing something and made the following suggestions in the form of a motion. <br />1. All signs be put back up. <br />2. Immediate enforcement of leashes on dogs <br />3. Allow the trapping to begin in cooperation with the Bay Area Coalition of Animal <br />Protection Organizations who have agreed to relocate feral cats, skunks and raccoons <br />4. Hire a law firm to look at all of the pertinent permits <br />S. Conduct a lobbying campaign with fellow mayors, council members and other cities <br />that front the bay that have public recreation or access areas on the bay <br />6. Not start the process for the placement of gates <br />The motion did not receive a second. The motion failed. <br />Council Member Hartnett stated it would be fair to say that every Council Member does not <br />want access to the levees cut off to people and they don't want any of the people living in <br />Redwood Shores to be harmed by flooding due to inadequate levees. Additionally, Council <br />does not want the people in Redwood Shores to pay additional money for flood insurance <br />as part of their required homeowners' insurance if the levee project is not completed. <br />Council does not want the endangered species obliterated and does not want the City to be <br />sued or criminally liable. Council Member Hartnett stated the question is what is the best <br />way to maintain access both in the immediate future and in the long term and is it better for <br />us to begin a new negotiation process with a vote tonight that includes acceptance of the bid <br />for the gates. He followed with a multi -part motion. <br />M/S Hartnett/Claire to take the following action: <br />Adopt RESOLUTION 13819 ACCEPTING BID FOR REDWOOD SHORES <br />LEVEE FENCING AND GATES PROJECT; AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF <br />AGREEMENT FOR SAID WORK; AND DIRECTING RETURN OF SECURITY <br />DEPOSITS <br />Instruct the City Manager to communicate through all offices available and the Office <br />of the Secretary of the Interior, immediately, as well as the Office of Fish and Wildlife <br />as to the reasons why the conditions of the permit related to access should be changed <br />so that access would be allowed. <br />Authorize and direct the City Manager to create a program whereby people access <br />would be allowed every day on the levee during daylight hours except during high <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />JANUARY 24, 2000 <br />PAGE <br />MINUTES Book No.58 <br />Page NO. 17 <br />