Laserfiche WebLink
�. A- <br /> I <br /> �EPO�r <br /> To the Honorable May�or and City Council <br /> From the City Manager <br /> September 27, 2004 <br /> SubjeCt <br /> FY 2004/05 General Fund Budget <br /> Recommendation <br /> It is recommended that the City Council: 1) after receiving input at a duly noticed public <br /> hearing, adopt a resolution implementing the Planning Cost Recovery Policy, and 2) <br /> introduce an ordinance amending the FY 2004/05 general fund budget that reflects staff's <br /> recommendation to implement the Planning Cost Recovery Policy. The Council may also <br /> elect to include in this ordinance any of the proposed expenditure reductions presented in <br /> this report, but staff is not recommending any additional reductions at this time. <br /> Background <br /> At the 1 S ` FY 2004/05 budget study session, the City Council directed the City Manager to <br /> return to Council no later than the end of September with a combination of $1 million in <br /> additional expenditure reductions and revenue increases to narrow the expected <br /> FY2004/05 general fund operating deficit. Further, Council directed that there be no <br /> further expenditure reductions in FY2004/05 to the City Clerk, Fire Department, or Police <br /> Department budgets. Since the City Council accepted the entire 15% reductions for the <br /> Human Resources and City Attorney departments, no further reductions are proposed for <br /> these departments in FY 2004/05. The general fund budget adopted for FY2004/05 <br /> projects $4.1 million in expenditures greater than revenues. <br /> The general fund's FY 2003/04 financial performance appears to be better than expected <br /> when the FY 2004/05 budget was prepared in the spring of 2004. Based on the <br /> preliminary, un-audited financial information available to us at the time this report was <br /> prepared, revenues and expenditures were close to being in balance in FY 2003/04 which <br /> is much better than the $2.5 million operating deficit that was projected. <br /> Revenues were about $1.7 million or 2.9% higher than expected while expenditures were <br /> about $.6 million, or 1% lower than expected (department heads anticipated the cuts for FY <br /> 2004/05 and held positions vacant in FY 2003/04, which led to the lower expenditures). If <br /> these results do not change during the upcoming audit, our ending fund balance reserves <br /> will not have declined to any significant extent during the past year. This is excellent news <br /> and may allow the Council to revisit the current reduction strategy. <br /> These results will not change at this time the projected revenue-expenditure imbalance <br /> (expenditures being forecast as greater than revenues) during the current year and future <br /> years. Staff will monitor revenues carefully during the next two quarters before making a <br /> new revenue forecast for FY 2005/06. <br /> After the Finance Department performs a thorough analysis of FY 2003/04 revenues and <br /> expenditures, we will be in a better position to explain the undertying causes of these <br /> variances. <br />