My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2000-09-11 Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC Min 2000-09-11 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 4:08:11 PM
Creation date
5/6/2002 9:50:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Inc.). The motion passed by a majority roll call vote with Council Member <br />Jordan voting no. <br />C. Council Member Howard stated she wanted to publicly thank Chu Chang, Senior Civil <br />Engineer, for the changing to a brighter light in the downtown area along El Camino <br />Real and Veterans Boulevard. Senior Civil Engineer Chang researched and found that <br />the cost would be less due to the fact that the higher sodium light actually lasts longer. <br />He has devised a program and during the next 18 months to 2 years, the lights will be <br />changed from a yellow to white. The white lights will provide assistance in safety and <br />appearance. <br />M/S Hartnett/Howard to adopt RESOLUTION 14043 ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2000- <br />2001 STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (UPGRADING); AUTHORIZING <br />EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR SAID WORK; AND DIRECTING RETURN OF <br />SECURITIES DEPOSITS. The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote. (304) <br />8. STAFF REPORTS — <br />A) Interim Urgency Ordinance to modify and add the definitions, uses, and development <br />standards related to commercial and industrial districts in the Zoning Ordinance. <br />Community Development Director Nelson explained the need for the urgency ordinance <br />and showed several pictures illustrating examples of "office creep ". She further explained <br />an ordinance was previously presented and that Council directed a focused ordinance be <br />brought back for consideration. She stated the current proposed ordinance is focused on <br />four major issues: introduction of a floor area ratio (FAR), incentives for housing, some <br />changes in office uses and changes to parking standards. (301) <br />Council asked various questions related to the FAR examples shown <br />Public Comment. <br />John Baer spoke in opposition to the urgency ordinance and urged Council to look at <br />zoning in other cities. <br />Ted Hannig requested Council carefully consider and urged caution in implementing an <br />emergency ordinance. He cited Government Code 65858 requiring there be legislative <br />findings that there is a current and immediate threat to public health, safety and welfare and <br />that any projects that come along during the interim urgency ordinance would also pose <br />this threat. He stated dialogue with the community is necessary. <br />Susan Keely stated small businesses have been lost in her area and there is an emergency <br />in that area. She stated staff and Council must protect the needs of the community. <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />September 11, 2000 <br />PAGE 8 <br />MINUTES Book No.58 <br />Page NO. 210 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.