My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2000-10-16
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC Min 2000-10-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 4:07:53 PM
Creation date
5/6/2002 9:51:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/16/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Public Comment: <br />Frank J. Deighan requested Council defer consideration and adoption of the ordinance so <br />that the residents of Redwood Shores and the Council can examine the full ramifications of <br />the ordinance. He stated if adoption were not deferred he would ask that Redwood Shores <br />be excluded from the ordinance due to the problems it would pose with the CC &R's. <br />Bob Diaz agreed that the matter is a quality of life issue. He asked that the units be kept at <br />R -1 and each case be dealt with individually and supported homeowners living on site. <br />Keith Daum supported a 20 -ft. rear property line setback and requested Council consider <br />the negative impacts of the proposed accessory dwelling unit parking requirements on <br />already impacted neighborhoods. <br />Council comments included consideration of a parking permit concept in some <br />neighborhoods and requested comparison of setback requirements to structures other than <br />second dwelling units. <br />M/S Hartnett/Jordan to not introduce the ordinance; create a Council committee to work <br />with staff to develop recommendations for consideration; clear public notification of <br />proposed recommendations to be given prior to adoption of the ordinance; and distribution <br />to the public would state that Council is considering a revision to the second dwelling <br />ordinance that would include the following: <br />1) The ordinance would be changed to allow a property owner to reside in either the main <br />or second unit while allowing exception where undue hardship exists; <br />2) The unit size to be only 640 square feet regardless of lot size; <br />3) One additional parking space to be required, may be uncovered or tandem parking <br />located in the driveway but not within the 20 -ft. garage setback; <br />4) Garage must be used for vehicle storage; <br />5) A nondiscretionary permit with public notification would be required; <br />6) An amnesty program of up to two years would be established to include the deed <br />restriction concept relative to allowing properties without an owner living onsite but <br />that are otherwise legal can remain as is until change of ownership; <br />7) The unit setback would remain at 20 feet in the rear. <br />The motion passed by a majority roll call vote with Council Member Ira and Vice Mayor <br />Claire voting no. <br />Mayor Ruskin announced Council Member Hartnett, Chair to the committee and Council <br />Members Jordan and Pierce, members to the committee to consider the second dwelling <br />unit ordinance. MINUTE ORDER 00 -314 <br />Recess: 9:50 -10:00 p.m. <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 16, 2000 <br />PAGE 5 <br />MINUTES Book No.58 <br />Page NO. 226 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.