My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2017 8:17:26 AM
Creation date
5/18/2017 3:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/22/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 17 of 27 <br /> <br />along the Project’s street frontage will help to further the objectives of the DTPP as <br />these features help make Jefferson Ave. feel much more walkable and welcoming than <br />the present conditions. As such, the Project is consistent with all aspects of public <br />frontage and streetscape provisions of the DTPP, and the complete streets policy. <br /> <br />v. The Project is Consistent with the Community Intent and Guiding <br />Principles of the DTPP, and its Policies to Promote the Development of a <br />Vibrant Downtown Community Through Commercial Development of a <br />Range of Buildings <br /> <br />Appellants’ Contention: The Project violates the DTPP vision to retain the “history, <br />charm and livability” of an historic medium sized city; that it does not contribute to the <br />formation of a “vibrant and beautiful city center;” that it does not aid in creating a <br />“memorable urban district interwoven with the city’s identity;” that it fails to “achieve <br />benefit to the widest possible range of user populations;” that it does not “rebuild the <br />downtown on the traditional framework” of its history and scale; that it does not <br />represent “urbanism;” that it does not reflect the “vision” of the DTPP as depicted in the <br />drawings on pages 19-23; and that it does not emphasize streets doubling as “outdoor <br />open spaces.” (See Appeal, pp. 2-3) <br /> <br />City’s Response: As discussed throughout this report, with the exception of the reduced <br />parking pursuant to allowances under the State Density Bonus law and DTPP, the <br />Project meets all of the development standards and all but fifteen of the design <br />guidelines. The guideline deviations were reviewed by the AAC and approved by the <br />Planning Commission as required under the DTPP, and as such, the Project is <br />consistent with the intent and guiding principles of the DTPP. <br /> <br />The DTPP allows for buildings up to 12-stories in height on the subject parcel because it <br />is located within the downtown core where the maximum building heights are intended <br />to be the tallest. The DTPP acknowledges that Redwood City’s downtown is both older <br />and larger than most other towns along the Peninsula where the “downtown” is defined <br />by a single pedestrian thoroughfare or “main street.” The DTPP aims to create <br />prominent pedestrian streets and the “dramatic silhouette of a medium-sized city center” <br />unlike neighboring Peninsula downtowns that “are characterized by a fairly even <br />distribution of one, two and three story buildings.” The Project meets these objectives, <br />as it will help to create that “dramatic silhouette” through its 6-story building height and <br />contemporary architectural styling, both of which are in keeping with the scale and style <br />of numerous buildings within the vicinity and throughout the North of Marshall District. <br /> <br />Additionally, whereas the great majority of residential projects approved and <br />constructed to-date in the downtown have been market-rate rental apartments, the <br />Project would create 20 for-sale residential condominiums that are affordable at the low- <br />income level, and part of the DTPP’s intent is to promote “dense housing options” <br />designed for a range of both rental and for-sale housing types. Also, the DTPP aims to <br />“accommodate all people comfortably, regardless of age, economic status, disability, or <br />ethnicity.” (DTPP, pp. 14-15) <br />8.A. - Page 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.