My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2017 8:17:26 AM
Creation date
5/18/2017 3:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/22/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 20 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />The City followed these sets of provisions. In addition to an Environmental Assessment <br />being conducted, the City prepared a written checklist (i.e., the Initial Study) to evaluate <br />the site-specific Project in light of the DTPP EIR. The City analyzed whether the Project <br />would create new significant impacts or substantial increases in the severity of <br />previously identified significant impacts, or whether a new mitigation measure or <br />alternative would substantially reduce significant effects. No such impacts were <br />identified. Nor is any new mitigation measure or alternative required to substantially <br />reduce any significant impact. Thus, an additional EIR is not required. Further, because <br />the Project is consistent with the DTPP for which an EIR was prepared, and there are <br />no significant impacts peculiar to this Project or the subject site, or any other <br />circumstances that require an EIR, no further environmental review is/was required. <br />Accordingly, the City’s environmental review process complies with CEQA, pursuant to <br />sections 15168, 15162, 15163 and 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. <br /> <br />ii. The Project Will Not Create Traffic Impacts that Require a New or <br />Supplemental EIR <br /> <br />Appellant’s Contentions: The City cannot rely on the DTPP EIR as it relates to traffic <br />because it is outdated and prepared before the consolidation of County Court services <br />in the downtown; and, because only a portion of the approved projects have been <br />completed to-date. (See Appeal pp. 6-7) <br /> <br />City’s Response: As explained in detail below, further environmental review regarding <br />traffic is not required, including because the potential traffic impacts of the 612 Jefferson <br />Avenue Project are within the previously analyzed impacts of the DTPP, and there are <br />no new significant impacts or substantial increases in the severity of any previously <br />identified impacts. <br /> <br />General Plan Traffic Projections <br />The Redwood City General Plan was adopted on October 11, 2010. An Environmental <br />Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the General Plan that, among other things, <br />considered existing traffic and circulation and modeled potential future traffic generation <br />based on full build-out of the various land use designations throughout the City. For this <br />analysis, the City developed a citywide travel demand model based on the C/CAG <br />regional model, which includes land use and transportation network information for the <br />region. The model forecasted morning and evening peak period traffic for all major <br />roadways with the City. <br /> <br />Recent economic growth in the Bay Area has contributed to a rise in traffic volumes on <br />streets throughout the region and in Redwood City. Comparing traffic counts from the <br />last three years with traffic volumes from the General Plan EIR shows that some <br />segments have higher volumes than were projected in the EIR. In each instance where <br />this occurred, the recently collected traffic volumes do not represent a new or more <br />significant impact than was identified in the EIR. Table 3 below illustrates this using <br />8.A. - Page 20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.